Nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward physical restraint and seclusion in an inpatients’ psychiatric ward

Q1 Social Sciences
A. Khalil, Manal Ali Mohammad Al Ghamdi, Sarah Al Malki
{"title":"Nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward physical restraint and seclusion in an inpatients’ psychiatric ward","authors":"A. Khalil, Manal Ali Mohammad Al Ghamdi, Sarah Al Malki","doi":"10.1080/17542863.2017.1329330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The objective is to assess psychiatric nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding the use of physical restraints and seclusion in an inpatient psychiatric ward at Jeddah Psychiatric Hospital, Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia. A descriptive correlation exploratory design was used with 37 nurses, selected conveniently. A self-administered structured questionnaire developed by Janelli, L. M., Kanski, G. W., Scherer, Y. K., & Neary, M. A. (1992. Physical restraints: Practice, attitudes/knowledge among nursing staff. Journal of Long Term Care Administration, 20(2), 22–25) was used. The respondents were 37 nurses, of whom 52.8% were male. Moderate knowledge and attitude with strong intent to use physical restraint were found among participants. There was no significant correlation between nurses’ practice, knowledge, and attitude scores. It was noted that 33.3% of the respondents preferred using both restraints and seclusion. The male gender was correlated with the use of physical restraints r = −.341, while use of seclusion had positive significant correlation with nurses’ level of education r = .465, and negative correlation with other demographic background. This study shows that nurses’ inadequate level of knowledge on the physical and psychological effects of restraints and seclusion impact their performance and attitude in caring with psychiatric patients. Therefore, an in-service training program on procedure, indication, and negative consequences of restraints and seclusion is highly suggested to limit the frequency of restraint and seclusion use among psychiatric patients.","PeriodicalId":38926,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Culture and Mental Health","volume":"66 1","pages":"447 - 467"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Culture and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17542863.2017.1329330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

ABSTRACT The objective is to assess psychiatric nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding the use of physical restraints and seclusion in an inpatient psychiatric ward at Jeddah Psychiatric Hospital, Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia. A descriptive correlation exploratory design was used with 37 nurses, selected conveniently. A self-administered structured questionnaire developed by Janelli, L. M., Kanski, G. W., Scherer, Y. K., & Neary, M. A. (1992. Physical restraints: Practice, attitudes/knowledge among nursing staff. Journal of Long Term Care Administration, 20(2), 22–25) was used. The respondents were 37 nurses, of whom 52.8% were male. Moderate knowledge and attitude with strong intent to use physical restraint were found among participants. There was no significant correlation between nurses’ practice, knowledge, and attitude scores. It was noted that 33.3% of the respondents preferred using both restraints and seclusion. The male gender was correlated with the use of physical restraints r = −.341, while use of seclusion had positive significant correlation with nurses’ level of education r = .465, and negative correlation with other demographic background. This study shows that nurses’ inadequate level of knowledge on the physical and psychological effects of restraints and seclusion impact their performance and attitude in caring with psychiatric patients. Therefore, an in-service training program on procedure, indication, and negative consequences of restraints and seclusion is highly suggested to limit the frequency of restraint and seclusion use among psychiatric patients.
精神科住院病人病房护士对身体约束和隔离的知识、态度和实践
目的是评估精神科护士的知识,态度和做法,关于使用物理约束和隔离在吉达精神科医院住院的精神科病房,卫生部,沙特阿拉伯。采用描述性相关探索性设计,选取方便的37名护士。Janelli, L. M., Kanski, G. W., Scherer, Y. K.和Neary, M. A.(1992)开发的自我管理的结构化问卷。身体约束:护理人员的实践、态度/知识。长期护理管理杂志,20(2),22-25。受访护士37名,男性占52.8%。参与者对肢体约束的认知和态度较为温和,但使用肢体约束的意图较强。护士的实践、知识和态度得分之间无显著相关。有人指出,33.3%的答复者倾向于同时使用约束和隔离。男性与肢体约束的使用相关r =−。341,而隔离使用与护士文化程度正显著相关r =。465,与其他人口背景呈负相关。本研究表明,护士对约束隔离的生理和心理影响的认知水平不足,会影响其护理精神病人的表现和态度。因此,我们强烈建议针对约束和隔离的程序、适应症和负面后果进行在职培训,以限制精神病患者使用约束和隔离的频率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Culture and Mental Health
International Journal of Culture and Mental Health Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: This title has ceased (2018). This important peer-review journal provides an innovative forum, both international and multidisciplinary, for addressing cross-cultural issues and mental health. Culture as it comes to bear on mental health is a rapidly expanding area of inquiry and research within psychiatry and psychology, and other related fields such as social work, with important implications for practice in the global context. The journal is an essential resource for health care professionals working in the field of cross-cultural mental health.Readership includes psychiatrists, psychologists, medical anthropologists, medical sociologists, psychiatric nurses and social workers, general practitioners and other mental health professionals interested in the area. The International Journal of Culture and Mental Health publishes original empirical research, review papers and theoretical articles in the fields of cross-cultural psychiatry and psychology. Contributions from the fields of medical anthropology and medical sociology are particularly welcome. A continuing dialogue between members of various disciplines in various fields is encouraged. The aim of the journal is to encourage its readers to think about various issues which have clouded cross-cultural development of ideas. The journal lays special emphasis on developing further links between medical anthropology, medical sociology, clinical psychiatry and psychology, and implications of the findings on service provisions. The journal is published four times a year. The style of reference is Harvard. All research articles in this journal, including those in special issues, special sections or supplements, have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymized refereeing by at least two independent referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信