Safety and Efficacy of Stereoelectroencephalography in Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery

IF 0.2 Q4 PEDIATRICS
J. Kassiri, C. Elliott, Natarie Liu, K. Narvacan, Matt Wheatly, D. Sinclair
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Stereoelectroencephalography in Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery","authors":"J. Kassiri, C. Elliott, Natarie Liu, K. Narvacan, Matt Wheatly, D. Sinclair","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1743192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is the preoperative assessment of choice when the epileptogenic zone (EZ) is unclear in patients requiring surgery for severe, drug-refractory epilepsy. There are relatively little data on the safety and efficacy of SEEG in the pediatric epilepsy population. We, therefore, investigated the insertional complications, rate of successful identification of the EZ, and long-term seizure outcomes following surgery after SEEG in children. This was a retrospective study of drug-resistant pediatric epilepsy patients treated with surgery between 2005 and 2020 and who underwent presurgical SEEG. Rationale for and coverage of SEEG, identification of the EZ, and ultimate seizure outcome following SEEG-tailored resections were collected and analyzed. Thirty patients (15 male, mean age: 12.4 ± 5 years) who underwent SEEG were studied. SEEG-related complications occurred in one case (3%). A total of 190 multicontact electrodes (mean: 7.0 ± 2.5 per patient) were implanted across 30 insertions capturing 440 electrographic seizures (mean: 17.5 ± 27.6 per patient). The most common rationale for SEEG was normal magnetic resonance imaging with surface EEG that failed to identify the EZ (17/30; 57%). SEEG identified a putative EZ in all cases, resulting in SEEG-tailored resections in 25/30 (83%). Freedom from disabling seizures was achieved following resections in 20/25 cases (80%) with 5.9 ± 4.0 years of postoperative follow-up. SEEG is a safe and effective way to identify the EZ in the presurgical evaluation of children with refractory epilepsy and permits effective and long-lasting SEEG-tailored resections.","PeriodicalId":42559,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Epilepsy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Epilepsy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1743192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is the preoperative assessment of choice when the epileptogenic zone (EZ) is unclear in patients requiring surgery for severe, drug-refractory epilepsy. There are relatively little data on the safety and efficacy of SEEG in the pediatric epilepsy population. We, therefore, investigated the insertional complications, rate of successful identification of the EZ, and long-term seizure outcomes following surgery after SEEG in children. This was a retrospective study of drug-resistant pediatric epilepsy patients treated with surgery between 2005 and 2020 and who underwent presurgical SEEG. Rationale for and coverage of SEEG, identification of the EZ, and ultimate seizure outcome following SEEG-tailored resections were collected and analyzed. Thirty patients (15 male, mean age: 12.4 ± 5 years) who underwent SEEG were studied. SEEG-related complications occurred in one case (3%). A total of 190 multicontact electrodes (mean: 7.0 ± 2.5 per patient) were implanted across 30 insertions capturing 440 electrographic seizures (mean: 17.5 ± 27.6 per patient). The most common rationale for SEEG was normal magnetic resonance imaging with surface EEG that failed to identify the EZ (17/30; 57%). SEEG identified a putative EZ in all cases, resulting in SEEG-tailored resections in 25/30 (83%). Freedom from disabling seizures was achieved following resections in 20/25 cases (80%) with 5.9 ± 4.0 years of postoperative follow-up. SEEG is a safe and effective way to identify the EZ in the presurgical evaluation of children with refractory epilepsy and permits effective and long-lasting SEEG-tailored resections.
立体脑电图在小儿癫痫手术中的安全性和有效性
立体脑电图(SEEG)是术前评估的选择,当癫痫区(EZ)不清楚的患者需要手术治疗严重,药物难治性癫痫。关于SEEG在儿童癫痫人群中的安全性和有效性的数据相对较少。因此,我们研究了儿童SEEG术后的插入并发症、EZ的成功识别率和长期癫痫发作结果。这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象是2005年至2020年间接受手术治疗并接受术前SEEG治疗的耐药儿童癫痫患者。收集和分析了seg的基本原理和覆盖范围、EZ的识别以及seg切除后的最终癫痫发作结果。研究了30例行SEEG的患者,其中男性15例,平均年龄12.4±5岁。1例(3%)发生seeg相关并发症。共植入190个多接触电极(平均每名患者7.0±2.5个),30次插入共捕获440次电图发作(平均每名患者17.5±27.6次)。SEEG最常见的理由是正常的表面脑电图磁共振成像未能识别EZ (17/30;57%)。SEEG在所有病例中都确定了推定的EZ,结果25/30(83%)的患者进行了seg定制切除。术后随访5.9±4.0年,20/25例(80%)患者切除后无致残性癫痫发作。在难治性癫痫患儿的术前评估中,SEEG是一种安全有效的识别EZ的方法,并允许有效和持久的针对seg的切除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatric Epilepsy is an English multidisciplinary peer-reviewed international journal publishing articles on all topics related to epilepsy and seizure disorders, epilepsy surgery, neurology, neurosurgery, and neuropsychology in childhood. These topics include the basic sciences related to the condition itself, the differential diagnosis, natural history, and epidemiology of seizures, and the investigation and practical management of epilepsy (including drug treatment, neurosurgery and non-medical and behavioral treatments). Use of model organisms and in vitro techniques relevant to epilepsy are also acceptable. Journal of Pediatric Epilepsy provides an in-depth update on new subjects and current comprehensive coverage of the latest techniques used in the diagnosis and treatment of childhood epilepsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信