Shared decisions in neonatal intensive care − bioethical approach

Carmen Carvalho, A. Freitas, L. Pinho, A. Novo
{"title":"Shared decisions in neonatal intensive care − bioethical approach","authors":"Carmen Carvalho, A. Freitas, L. Pinho, A. Novo","doi":"10.25753/BIRTHGROWTHMJ.V30.I1.20315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technological and therapeutic advances in neonatal intensive care have led to a decrease in neonatal morbidity and mortality in recent decades. Along with technical and scientific expertise, it is important to provide a holistic and comprehensive approach to the care of the newborn and family. The purpose of this review is to describe and analyze strategies to improve decision-making within a shared process between health professionals and caregivers at neonatal intensive care setting.\nThe decision-making process is not linear or immutable over time and there is no consensus on the definition of ‘shared decision’. More unanimous is the role of communication as a atherapeutic relationship pillar. Professional ethics, bioethics, and narrative medicine should be used as tools to address the vulnerabilities of families and professionals and as a way to consolidate and structure the human relational dimension intrinsic to medical practice.","PeriodicalId":31313,"journal":{"name":"Nascer e Crescer","volume":"96 1","pages":"39-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nascer e Crescer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25753/BIRTHGROWTHMJ.V30.I1.20315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Technological and therapeutic advances in neonatal intensive care have led to a decrease in neonatal morbidity and mortality in recent decades. Along with technical and scientific expertise, it is important to provide a holistic and comprehensive approach to the care of the newborn and family. The purpose of this review is to describe and analyze strategies to improve decision-making within a shared process between health professionals and caregivers at neonatal intensive care setting. The decision-making process is not linear or immutable over time and there is no consensus on the definition of ‘shared decision’. More unanimous is the role of communication as a atherapeutic relationship pillar. Professional ethics, bioethics, and narrative medicine should be used as tools to address the vulnerabilities of families and professionals and as a way to consolidate and structure the human relational dimension intrinsic to medical practice.
新生儿重症监护中的共同决策——生物伦理方法
近几十年来,新生儿重症监护的技术和治疗进步导致新生儿发病率和死亡率下降。除了技术和科学专业知识外,重要的是提供一个全面和综合的方法来照顾新生儿和家庭。本综述的目的是描述和分析在新生儿重症监护环境中卫生专业人员和护理人员共享过程中改善决策的策略。随着时间的推移,决策过程不是线性的,也不是不变的,对“共同决策”的定义也没有共识。更一致的观点是沟通作为治疗关系支柱的作用。职业伦理、生命伦理和叙事医学应被用作解决家庭和专业人员脆弱性的工具,并作为巩固和构建医疗实践固有的人际关系维度的一种方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信