The use of endoscopic band ligation in the primary prevention of bleeding in patients with ascites listed in the liver transplantation waiting list

V. L. Korobka, V. Pasechnikov, R. V. Korobka, E. Pak, A. M. Shapovalov, D. Pasechnikov, N. Sapronova, Y. Khoronko
{"title":"The use of endoscopic band ligation in the primary prevention of bleeding in patients with ascites listed in the liver transplantation waiting list","authors":"V. L. Korobka, V. Pasechnikov, R. V. Korobka, E. Pak, A. M. Shapovalov, D. Pasechnikov, N. Sapronova, Y. Khoronko","doi":"10.23873/2074-0506-2023-15-2-158-167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Saving lives and preventing patients from dropping out of the waiting list for liver transplantation due to the progression of portal hypertension and the development of complications is an urgent task of transplantology in conditions of a donor organ shortage, which causes long waiting times for this operation. Aim. To study the efficacy of endoscopic band ligation versus no intervention in the primary prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and assess the impact on survival of patients with ascites listed in the liver transplantation waiting list. Material and methods. A retrospective comparative study was conducted in patients with decompensated liver diseases with severe ascites and varicose veins, without a history of bleeding, when included in the waiting list for liver transplantation. Primary prevention of bleeding from varices was carried out in patients by means of endoscopic ligation of varicose veins (n=92, group 1); this intervention was not performed in other patients (n=89, group 2). Results. The compared groups were comparable in demographics, clinical parameters, MELD and Child-TurcottePugh scores, or the incidence of severe ascites. The study groups of patients did not have significant differences in the numbers of medium-size and large varices. The incidence of bleeding was significantly lower in the group of patients with endoscopic band ligation as a method of primary prevention than in the group of patients without this intervention (23.9% and 78.7%, respectively, p=0.0001). Patient survival was significantly higher in the group of patients who underwent endoscopic band ligation than in the group of patients without interventions, which was established using the Kaplan-Meier method (Log Rank=0.0001). Conclusion. Primary prevention of bleeding from the upper digestive tract through endoscopic band ligation is an effective method of saving lives and preventing patients with ascites from dropping out of the liver transplantation waiting list in conditions of a donor organ shortageб which causes a long waiting period for surgery.","PeriodicalId":23229,"journal":{"name":"Transplantologiya. The Russian Journal of Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantologiya. The Russian Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23873/2074-0506-2023-15-2-158-167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Saving lives and preventing patients from dropping out of the waiting list for liver transplantation due to the progression of portal hypertension and the development of complications is an urgent task of transplantology in conditions of a donor organ shortage, which causes long waiting times for this operation. Aim. To study the efficacy of endoscopic band ligation versus no intervention in the primary prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and assess the impact on survival of patients with ascites listed in the liver transplantation waiting list. Material and methods. A retrospective comparative study was conducted in patients with decompensated liver diseases with severe ascites and varicose veins, without a history of bleeding, when included in the waiting list for liver transplantation. Primary prevention of bleeding from varices was carried out in patients by means of endoscopic ligation of varicose veins (n=92, group 1); this intervention was not performed in other patients (n=89, group 2). Results. The compared groups were comparable in demographics, clinical parameters, MELD and Child-TurcottePugh scores, or the incidence of severe ascites. The study groups of patients did not have significant differences in the numbers of medium-size and large varices. The incidence of bleeding was significantly lower in the group of patients with endoscopic band ligation as a method of primary prevention than in the group of patients without this intervention (23.9% and 78.7%, respectively, p=0.0001). Patient survival was significantly higher in the group of patients who underwent endoscopic band ligation than in the group of patients without interventions, which was established using the Kaplan-Meier method (Log Rank=0.0001). Conclusion. Primary prevention of bleeding from the upper digestive tract through endoscopic band ligation is an effective method of saving lives and preventing patients with ascites from dropping out of the liver transplantation waiting list in conditions of a donor organ shortageб which causes a long waiting period for surgery.
内镜下带结扎在肝移植候诊患者腹水出血的一级预防中的应用
背景。在供体器官短缺的情况下,挽救生命和防止患者因门静脉高压的进展和并发症的发展而退出肝移植等待名单是移植学的紧迫任务,这导致了手术的长时间等待。的目标。研究内镜下结扎与不干预对上消化道出血一级预防的效果,并评估对肝移植候诊名单中腹水患者生存期的影响。材料和方法。回顾性比较研究纳入肝移植候诊名单中伴有严重腹水和静脉曲张的失代偿性肝病患者,无出血史。通过内窥镜下静脉曲张结扎对患者进行静脉曲张出血的一级预防(n=92,组1);其他患者未进行此干预(n=89,组2)。比较组在人口统计学、临床参数、MELD和child - turcotepugh评分或严重腹水发生率方面具有可比性。两组患者在中、大静脉曲张数量上没有显著差异。内镜下结扎作为一种预防方法的患者出血发生率明显低于未进行这种干预的患者(分别为23.9%和78.7%,p=0.0001)。采用Kaplan-Meier方法(Log Rank=0.0001)证实,内镜下结扎组患者的生存率明显高于未干预组患者。结论。内镜下结扎对上消化道出血进行一级预防,是在供体器官短缺导致手术等待时间过长的情况下,挽救生命和防止腹水患者退出肝移植等待名单的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信