Nature-Inspired Meta-heuristic Optimization Algorithms for Breast Cancer Diagnostic Model: A Comparative Study

T. Oladele, Babatunde J Olorunsola, T. O. Aro, Hakeem Babalola Akande, Oyenike A Olukiran
{"title":"Nature-Inspired Meta-heuristic Optimization Algorithms for Breast Cancer Diagnostic Model: A Comparative Study","authors":"T. Oladele, Babatunde J Olorunsola, T. O. Aro, Hakeem Babalola Akande, Oyenike A Olukiran","doi":"10.46792/FUOYEJET.V6I1.598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The selection of features is used to obtain a subset of features by the removal of irrelevant features with no or less predictive output. Meta-heuristic algorithms are appropriate for the selection of features because feature subset representation is direct and the evaluation is easily accomplished. This paper performed a comparative study on the impact of meta-heuristic optimization algorithms on breast cancer diagnosis using Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). The two feature selection algorithms were used to obtain the relevant attributes from the Wisconsin breast cancer (original) dataset. The selected attributes were passed to seven learning algorithms: Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (C4.5), Naive Bayes (NB), K Nearest Neighhood (KNN), Neural Network (NN), Logistic Regression (LR), and Random Forest (RF). The diagnostic model was evaluated based on accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-measure. Experimental showed that the highest accuracy of 97.1388% was obtained in both PSO and ACO using RF classifier, the highest precision value of 0.9720 was recorded in ACO using RF classifier,  the highest recall value of 0.9750 was achieved in PSO using RF classifier, the highest F1-measure value of 0.9700 was obtained in PSO using SVM, the highest kappa statistic of 0.9370 was obtained in both PSO and ACO using RF and the lowest time of 0s was taken to build a model was recorded in PSO using KNN and NB, and also in ACO using KNN. The paper concluded that the breast diagnostic model using PSO and ACO with different learning algorithms revealed that the accuracy of RF outperformed other algorithms. Also, it was shown that ACO produced better precision using RF compared with PSO and PSO gave better recall using RF compared with ACO, PSO recorded an efficient F1-measure using SVM. The best time used to build a model was obtained in PSO for KNN and NB, and ACO with KNN. Keywords — Breast cancer, Data mining, Diagnosis, Feature selection, Meta-heuristic.","PeriodicalId":15735,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering and Technology","volume":"111 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46792/FUOYEJET.V6I1.598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The selection of features is used to obtain a subset of features by the removal of irrelevant features with no or less predictive output. Meta-heuristic algorithms are appropriate for the selection of features because feature subset representation is direct and the evaluation is easily accomplished. This paper performed a comparative study on the impact of meta-heuristic optimization algorithms on breast cancer diagnosis using Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). The two feature selection algorithms were used to obtain the relevant attributes from the Wisconsin breast cancer (original) dataset. The selected attributes were passed to seven learning algorithms: Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (C4.5), Naive Bayes (NB), K Nearest Neighhood (KNN), Neural Network (NN), Logistic Regression (LR), and Random Forest (RF). The diagnostic model was evaluated based on accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-measure. Experimental showed that the highest accuracy of 97.1388% was obtained in both PSO and ACO using RF classifier, the highest precision value of 0.9720 was recorded in ACO using RF classifier,  the highest recall value of 0.9750 was achieved in PSO using RF classifier, the highest F1-measure value of 0.9700 was obtained in PSO using SVM, the highest kappa statistic of 0.9370 was obtained in both PSO and ACO using RF and the lowest time of 0s was taken to build a model was recorded in PSO using KNN and NB, and also in ACO using KNN. The paper concluded that the breast diagnostic model using PSO and ACO with different learning algorithms revealed that the accuracy of RF outperformed other algorithms. Also, it was shown that ACO produced better precision using RF compared with PSO and PSO gave better recall using RF compared with ACO, PSO recorded an efficient F1-measure using SVM. The best time used to build a model was obtained in PSO for KNN and NB, and ACO with KNN. Keywords — Breast cancer, Data mining, Diagnosis, Feature selection, Meta-heuristic.
乳腺癌诊断模型的自然启发元启发式优化算法:比较研究
特征的选择是通过去除没有或较少预测输出的不相关特征来获得特征的子集。元启发式算法适合于特征的选择,因为特征子集的表示是直接的,评估容易完成。本文采用蚁群算法(Ant Colony optimization, ACO)和粒子群算法(Particle Swarm optimization, PSO)对元启发式优化算法对乳腺癌诊断的影响进行了对比研究。使用两种特征选择算法从威斯康星州乳腺癌(原始)数据集中获得相关属性。选择的属性被传递给七种学习算法:支持向量机(SVM)、决策树(C4.5)、朴素贝叶斯(NB)、K近邻(KNN)、神经网络(NN)、逻辑回归(LR)和随机森林(RF)。根据准确率、精密度、召回率和f1测量值对诊断模型进行评估。实验表明,使用射频分类器的粒子群算法和蚁群算法准确率均达到97.1388%,其中,使用射频分类器的蚁群算法准确率最高为0.9720,使用射频分类器的粒子群算法召回率最高为0.9750,使用支持向量机的粒子群算法的f1测量值最高为0.9700。使用射频的粒子群算法和蚁群算法kappa统计量最高,均为0.9370;使用KNN和NB的粒子群算法和使用KNN的蚁群算法建立模型所需的时间最短,均为0秒。本文的结论是,使用不同学习算法的PSO和ACO的乳腺诊断模型显示,RF的准确性优于其他算法。此外,研究还表明,与蚁群算法相比,使用射频的蚁群算法产生了更好的精度,使用射频的蚁群算法比使用蚁群算法提供了更好的召回率,使用支持向量机的蚁群算法记录了一个有效的f1度量。基于KNN和NB的粒子群算法和基于KNN的蚁群算法得到了最佳的模型建立时间。关键词:乳腺癌,数据挖掘,诊断,特征选择,元启发式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信