STPA enabled safety assessment in the architecting of complex systems

Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI:10.1080/09617353.2022.2145647
Sergio Jimeno Altelarrea, A. Riaz, M. Guenov
{"title":"STPA enabled safety assessment in the architecting of complex systems","authors":"Sergio Jimeno Altelarrea, A. Riaz, M. Guenov","doi":"10.1080/09617353.2022.2145647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract STPA is a hazard assessment technique that represents systems as hierarchical control structures composed of feedback control loops. Existing computational support focuses on creating the diagrams that depict these hierarchies. However, the elements in the loops and the signals exchanged must be determined manually. This impedes safety assessment, thus reducing the number of designs that can potentially be explored. Furthermore, the manual approach does not guarantee the correct update of the architecture with changes resulting from safety assessment, which can make the architecture inconsistent with the safety assessment. To overcome these limitations, proposed for the first time are two methods that automate the creation of: (1) hierarchical control structures and (2) detailed control loops. The methods create STPA models by analysing the architecture, which is modelled as a graph. The concept is illustrated with a representative example of a wheel brake system. The resulting models are compared with those obtained manually by the authors of STPA. The automation is shown to significantly reduce the required time and effort. It was also found to ensure consistency among the safety analysis and the architecture definition as it requires safety features to be included in the architecture before being considered in STPA analysis.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09617353.2022.2145647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract STPA is a hazard assessment technique that represents systems as hierarchical control structures composed of feedback control loops. Existing computational support focuses on creating the diagrams that depict these hierarchies. However, the elements in the loops and the signals exchanged must be determined manually. This impedes safety assessment, thus reducing the number of designs that can potentially be explored. Furthermore, the manual approach does not guarantee the correct update of the architecture with changes resulting from safety assessment, which can make the architecture inconsistent with the safety assessment. To overcome these limitations, proposed for the first time are two methods that automate the creation of: (1) hierarchical control structures and (2) detailed control loops. The methods create STPA models by analysing the architecture, which is modelled as a graph. The concept is illustrated with a representative example of a wheel brake system. The resulting models are compared with those obtained manually by the authors of STPA. The automation is shown to significantly reduce the required time and effort. It was also found to ensure consistency among the safety analysis and the architecture definition as it requires safety features to be included in the architecture before being considered in STPA analysis.
分享
查看原文
STPA允许在复杂系统的架构中进行安全评估
STPA是一种危险评估技术,它将系统表示为由反馈控制回路组成的分层控制结构。现有的计算支持侧重于创建描述这些层次结构的图。然而,环路中的元素和交换的信号必须手动确定。这阻碍了安全评估,从而减少了可以探索的设计数量。此外,手动方法不能保证由于安全评估而导致的体系结构更改的正确更新,这可能使体系结构与安全评估不一致。为了克服这些限制,首次提出了两种自动化创建的方法:(1)分层控制结构和(2)详细控制回路。该方法通过对体系结构的分析来创建STPA模型,并将其建模为图。以车轮制动系统为例说明了这一概念。将所得模型与STPA作者手工得到的模型进行了比较。自动化可以显著减少所需的时间和精力。它还可以确保安全分析和体系结构定义之间的一致性,因为它要求在进行STPA分析之前将安全特性包含在体系结构中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信