Psychotherapy and emancipation

Q4 Arts and Humanities
P. Dybel
{"title":"Psychotherapy and emancipation","authors":"P. Dybel","doi":"10.24917/20841043.9.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the article I ask the question about the place of an emancipatory task within various forms \nof psychotherapy and psychoanalysis, where conversations with the patient play an important \nrole. This task arises on discovering that an important source of the patient’s problems are \nviews inherited fom cultural traditions, ones which inhibit a proper assessment of various \ntraumatic situations fom the past and the forms of dependence on others. Then psychotherapists and psychoanalysts are inevitably faced with the task of making the patient aware of these \nlimitations and forms of dependence, for only then is therapeutic progress possible. I provide \nthree characteristic examples of similar cases fom Polish psychiatric tradition, in which we \ncan speak of a similarly binding role of cultural tradition in the process of therapy. I point out \nthat the difcult situation the therapist then fnds themselves in lies in the fact that, on the \none hand, they have to depart fom the postulate of maintaining world-view neutrality in their \napproach to the patient while, on the other hand, they cannot directly impose their own position on the patient. The therapist has to fnd a third, middle way betwee","PeriodicalId":30403,"journal":{"name":"Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24917/20841043.9.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the article I ask the question about the place of an emancipatory task within various forms of psychotherapy and psychoanalysis, where conversations with the patient play an important role. This task arises on discovering that an important source of the patient’s problems are views inherited fom cultural traditions, ones which inhibit a proper assessment of various traumatic situations fom the past and the forms of dependence on others. Then psychotherapists and psychoanalysts are inevitably faced with the task of making the patient aware of these limitations and forms of dependence, for only then is therapeutic progress possible. I provide three characteristic examples of similar cases fom Polish psychiatric tradition, in which we can speak of a similarly binding role of cultural tradition in the process of therapy. I point out that the difcult situation the therapist then fnds themselves in lies in the fact that, on the one hand, they have to depart fom the postulate of maintaining world-view neutrality in their approach to the patient while, on the other hand, they cannot directly impose their own position on the patient. The therapist has to fnd a third, middle way betwee
心理治疗和解放
在这篇文章中,我提出了一个关于解放任务在各种形式的心理治疗和精神分析中的位置的问题,在这些形式中,与病人的对话起着重要的作用。这项任务是在发现病人问题的一个重要来源是从文化传统中继承下来的观点,这些观点阻碍了对过去各种创伤情况的适当评估和对他人的依赖形式。因此,心理治疗师和精神分析学家不可避免地面临着让病人意识到这些限制和依赖形式的任务,因为只有这样,治疗才有可能取得进展。我提供了三个波兰精神病学传统中类似案例的典型例子,在这些案例中,我们可以谈论文化传统在治疗过程中的类似约束作用。我指出,治疗师发现自己所处的困境在于,一方面,他们必须在对待病人的方式中脱离维持世界观中立的假设,而另一方面,他们不能直接把自己的立场强加给病人。治疗师必须找到第三条中间道路
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Argument  Biannual Philosophical Journal
Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信