The effect of remifentanil on hemodynamic response to laryngeal mask airway insertion in induction of anesthesia with propofol fentanyl or propofol ketamine in cataract surgery

H. Shetabi, Leili Adinehmehr, Sharifi Faezeh
{"title":"The effect of remifentanil on hemodynamic response to laryngeal mask airway insertion in induction of anesthesia with propofol fentanyl or propofol ketamine in cataract surgery","authors":"H. Shetabi, Leili Adinehmehr, Sharifi Faezeh","doi":"10.34172/mj.2022.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Induction of general anesthesia may cause hemodynamic instability. Remifentanil is often prescribed to suppress the hemodynamic response to anesthesia. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of remifentanil on hemodynamic response to induction of anesthesia with propofol fentanyl or propofol ketamine and laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion. Methods. This double-blind randomized clinical trial study was performed on 44 candidates for cataract surgery in Feyz Hospital, Isfahan, Iran from March to June 2020. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups using random allocation software. The first group received 1 mcg/kg fentanyl and the second group received 0.5 mg/kg ketamine. Also, both groups received 1 mg/kg propofol and 0.5 mcg/kg remifentanil intravenously. Hemodynamic parameters were measured and recorded at study times, and the results were analyzed statistically. Results. The mean age (P=0.199), weight (P=0.050), height (P=0.9), and frequency distribution of gender (0.763) and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (0.069) were not significantly different between the two groups. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) in fentanyl group were significantly lower than the ketamine group immediately before LMA insertion, as well as 1, 3, and 5 minutes after LMA insertion (P <0.050). In addition, the mean heart rate (HR) in the fentanyl group decreased significantly at different time (P<0.001), but no significant difference was observed in ketamine group (P=0.056). In addition, the mean HR did not differ significantly between the two groups in any of the follow-up times (P>0.050). Conclusion. Intravenous administration of remifentanil in induction of anesthesia with propofol-ketamine and propofol-fentanyl reduced changes in hemodynamic responses to LMA insertion. This hemodynamic stability was increased by adding remifentanil to the propofol-ketamine combination. Practical Implications. Remifentanil is associated with weakening of hemodynamic responses to LMA insertion in induction of anesthesia with propofol and ketamine or propofol and fentanyl; this effect can be associated with safety in cardiac patients.","PeriodicalId":18474,"journal":{"name":"Medical journal of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences and Health Services","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical journal of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences and Health Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/mj.2022.029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Induction of general anesthesia may cause hemodynamic instability. Remifentanil is often prescribed to suppress the hemodynamic response to anesthesia. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of remifentanil on hemodynamic response to induction of anesthesia with propofol fentanyl or propofol ketamine and laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion. Methods. This double-blind randomized clinical trial study was performed on 44 candidates for cataract surgery in Feyz Hospital, Isfahan, Iran from March to June 2020. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups using random allocation software. The first group received 1 mcg/kg fentanyl and the second group received 0.5 mg/kg ketamine. Also, both groups received 1 mg/kg propofol and 0.5 mcg/kg remifentanil intravenously. Hemodynamic parameters were measured and recorded at study times, and the results were analyzed statistically. Results. The mean age (P=0.199), weight (P=0.050), height (P=0.9), and frequency distribution of gender (0.763) and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (0.069) were not significantly different between the two groups. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) in fentanyl group were significantly lower than the ketamine group immediately before LMA insertion, as well as 1, 3, and 5 minutes after LMA insertion (P <0.050). In addition, the mean heart rate (HR) in the fentanyl group decreased significantly at different time (P<0.001), but no significant difference was observed in ketamine group (P=0.056). In addition, the mean HR did not differ significantly between the two groups in any of the follow-up times (P>0.050). Conclusion. Intravenous administration of remifentanil in induction of anesthesia with propofol-ketamine and propofol-fentanyl reduced changes in hemodynamic responses to LMA insertion. This hemodynamic stability was increased by adding remifentanil to the propofol-ketamine combination. Practical Implications. Remifentanil is associated with weakening of hemodynamic responses to LMA insertion in induction of anesthesia with propofol and ketamine or propofol and fentanyl; this effect can be associated with safety in cardiac patients.
异丙酚芬太尼或异丙酚氯胺酮诱导白内障手术时,瑞芬太尼对喉罩气道插入血流动力学反应的影响
背景。全麻诱导可能引起血流动力学不稳定。瑞芬太尼常用于抑制麻醉后的血流动力学反应。本研究的目的是探讨瑞芬太尼对异丙酚芬太尼或异丙酚氯胺酮诱导麻醉和喉罩气道插入时血流动力学反应的影响。方法。本双盲随机临床试验研究于2020年3月至6月在伊朗伊斯法罕Feyz医院对44名白内障手术候选人进行了研究。采用随机分配软件将患者随机分为两组。第一组芬太尼1 mcg/kg,第二组氯胺酮0.5 mg/kg。两组均静脉注射异丙酚1 mg/kg和瑞芬太尼0.5 mcg/kg。在研究时间测量并记录血流动力学参数,并对结果进行统计学分析。结果。两组患者的平均年龄(P=0.199)、体重(P=0.050)、身高(P=0.9)、性别频次分布(0.763)和美国麻醉医师学会(ASA)评分(0.069)差异无统计学意义。芬太尼组收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、平均动脉压(MAP)在LMA插入前即刻及LMA插入后1、3、5 min均显著低于氯胺酮组(P 0.050)。结论。异丙酚氯胺酮和异丙酚芬太尼诱导麻醉时静脉给予瑞芬太尼可减少LMA插入后血流动力学反应的变化。在异丙酚-氯胺酮联合用药中加入瑞芬太尼可增加血流动力学稳定性。实际意义。在异丙酚和氯胺酮或异丙酚和芬太尼诱导麻醉时,瑞芬太尼与LMA插入的血流动力学反应减弱有关;这种效果可能与心脏病患者的安全性有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信