The EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement: Implications for ILO Standards and the European Social Charter in the United Kingdom

K. Ewing
{"title":"The EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement: Implications for ILO Standards and the European Social Charter in the United Kingdom","authors":"K. Ewing","doi":"10.1080/09615768.2021.1969757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the most notable developments in relation to the ILO for more than 20 years has been the reference to ILO standards in an increasingly diverse range of sources. These include corporate codes, global framework agreements, judicial decisions, the OECD Guidelines on Multinational Enterprises, and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, as well as bilateral and pluri-lateral free trade agreements and elsewhere. There is no shortage now of commitments to the ILO despite the employer generated controversy about its standards, though it cannot be said that the commitment is reflected in compliance. As labour standards continue to erode globally, the ILO provides much needed decoration in a liberal economic climate. In this article it is proposed with some scepticism to examine yet another frontier for ILO standards as the organisation passes its centenary. This is the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA) concluded in 2020 to deal with the relationship between the EU and the UK after Brexit. It may seem strange that what many (myself included) regard as a regressive step should contain the soil in which labour standards can grow","PeriodicalId":88025,"journal":{"name":"King's law journal : KLJ","volume":"145 1","pages":"306 - 343"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"King's law journal : KLJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2021.1969757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

One of the most notable developments in relation to the ILO for more than 20 years has been the reference to ILO standards in an increasingly diverse range of sources. These include corporate codes, global framework agreements, judicial decisions, the OECD Guidelines on Multinational Enterprises, and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, as well as bilateral and pluri-lateral free trade agreements and elsewhere. There is no shortage now of commitments to the ILO despite the employer generated controversy about its standards, though it cannot be said that the commitment is reflected in compliance. As labour standards continue to erode globally, the ILO provides much needed decoration in a liberal economic climate. In this article it is proposed with some scepticism to examine yet another frontier for ILO standards as the organisation passes its centenary. This is the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA) concluded in 2020 to deal with the relationship between the EU and the UK after Brexit. It may seem strange that what many (myself included) regard as a regressive step should contain the soil in which labour standards can grow
欧盟-英国贸易和合作协定:对劳工组织标准和联合王国《欧洲社会宪章》的影响
20多年来与劳工组织有关的最显著的发展之一是在越来越多样化的来源中提到劳工组织的标准。其中包括公司守则、全球框架协议、司法判决、经合组织跨国企业准则、联合国工商业与人权指导原则,以及双边和多边自由贸易协定等。尽管雇主对劳工组织的标准产生了争议,但现在不乏对劳工组织的承诺,尽管不能说承诺反映在遵守上。随着劳工标准在全球范围内继续受到侵蚀,国际劳工组织在自由的经济环境中提供了急需的装饰。在这篇文章中,它提出了一些怀疑来检查国际劳工组织标准的另一个前沿,因为该组织通过了它的百年纪念。这是欧盟与英国在2020年达成的贸易与合作协定(TCA),旨在处理英国脱欧后欧盟与英国的关系。许多人(包括我自己)认为是倒退的一步,却包含了劳动标准可以成长的土壤,这似乎有些奇怪
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信