Regulatory focus and learning. How the pursuit of promotion and prevention-focus goals influence informal learning in the workplace

J. Federman
{"title":"Regulatory focus and learning. How the pursuit of promotion and prevention-focus goals influence informal learning in the workplace","authors":"J. Federman","doi":"10.1108/dlo-11-2020-0220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to understand how regulatory focus influences informal learning behaviors. A growing body of research indicates that regulatory focus has significant consequences for goal pursuit in the workplace, yet it has not been readily studied or applied to the field of human resource management (Johnson et al., 2015). This is one of the few studies to examine the relationship between informal learning and regulatory focus theory that can be applied to the training and development field.,Using a qualitative research design, a semi-structured interview was used to increase the comparability of participant responses. Questions were asked in an open-ended manner, allowing for a structured approach for collecting information yet providing flexibility for the sake of gaining more in-depth responses. An interview guideline was used to standardize the questions and ensure similar kinds of information were obtained across participants. A typological analytic approach (Lincoln and Guba, 1985) was used to analyze the data.,In a sample of 16 working adults, (44% female and 56% male), participants who were identified as having either a promotion- or prevention-focus orientation were interviewed about types of informal learning strategies they used. The results revealed that performance success and failure have differential effects on learning behaviors for prevention and promotion-focus systems. Stress and errors motivate informal learning for the prevention-focus system, whereas positive affect motivates informal learning for the promotion-focus system. Prevention-focus participants articulated greater use of vicarious learning, reflective thinking and feedback-seeking as methods of informal learning. Promotion-focus participants articulated greater use of experimentation methods of informal learning.,This study provides an in-depth understanding of how regulatory focus influences informal learning. Few studies have considered how regulatory focus promotes distinct strategies and inclinations toward using informal learning. Performance success and failure have differential effects on informal learning behaviors for regulatory promotion and prevention systems. This has theoretical and practical implications in consideration of why employees engage in informal learning, and the tactics and strategies they use for learning.","PeriodicalId":39753,"journal":{"name":"Development and Learning in Organizations","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development and Learning in Organizations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dlo-11-2020-0220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to understand how regulatory focus influences informal learning behaviors. A growing body of research indicates that regulatory focus has significant consequences for goal pursuit in the workplace, yet it has not been readily studied or applied to the field of human resource management (Johnson et al., 2015). This is one of the few studies to examine the relationship between informal learning and regulatory focus theory that can be applied to the training and development field.,Using a qualitative research design, a semi-structured interview was used to increase the comparability of participant responses. Questions were asked in an open-ended manner, allowing for a structured approach for collecting information yet providing flexibility for the sake of gaining more in-depth responses. An interview guideline was used to standardize the questions and ensure similar kinds of information were obtained across participants. A typological analytic approach (Lincoln and Guba, 1985) was used to analyze the data.,In a sample of 16 working adults, (44% female and 56% male), participants who were identified as having either a promotion- or prevention-focus orientation were interviewed about types of informal learning strategies they used. The results revealed that performance success and failure have differential effects on learning behaviors for prevention and promotion-focus systems. Stress and errors motivate informal learning for the prevention-focus system, whereas positive affect motivates informal learning for the promotion-focus system. Prevention-focus participants articulated greater use of vicarious learning, reflective thinking and feedback-seeking as methods of informal learning. Promotion-focus participants articulated greater use of experimentation methods of informal learning.,This study provides an in-depth understanding of how regulatory focus influences informal learning. Few studies have considered how regulatory focus promotes distinct strategies and inclinations toward using informal learning. Performance success and failure have differential effects on informal learning behaviors for regulatory promotion and prevention systems. This has theoretical and practical implications in consideration of why employees engage in informal learning, and the tactics and strategies they use for learning.
监管重点和学习。对促进和预防目标的追求如何影响工作场所的非正式学习
本研究的目的是了解监管焦点如何影响非正式学习行为。越来越多的研究表明,监管焦点对工作场所的目标追求具有重要影响,但尚未被轻易研究或应用于人力资源管理领域(Johnson et al., 2015)。这是少数研究非正式学习和监管焦点理论之间关系的研究之一,可以应用于培训和发展领域。采用定性研究设计,采用半结构化访谈来增加参与者回答的可比性。问题是以不限成员名额的方式提出的,既允许采用有组织的方法收集资料,又提供灵活性,以便获得更深入的答复。访谈指南用于标准化问题,并确保在参与者中获得类似的信息。使用类型学分析方法(Lincoln and Guba, 1985)分析数据。在16名在职成年人的样本中(44%为女性,56%为男性),被确定为以促进或预防为重点的参与者接受了关于他们使用的非正式学习策略类型的采访。结果表明,绩效成功和失败对预防和促进重点系统的学习行为有不同的影响。压力和错误对预防导向系统的非正式学习有激励作用,而积极情绪对促进导向系统的非正式学习有激励作用。以预防为重点的参与者将更多地使用替代学习、反思性思维和寻求反馈作为非正式学习方法。以促进为重点的参与者阐明了更多地使用非正式学习的实验方法。本研究提供了对监管焦点如何影响非正式学习的深入理解。很少有研究考虑监管焦点如何促进不同的策略和使用非正式学习的倾向。绩效成功和失败对监管促进和预防系统的非正式学习行为有不同的影响。这在考虑员工参与非正式学习的原因以及他们使用的学习策略和策略方面具有理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Development and Learning in Organizations
Development and Learning in Organizations Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal is a unique management information resource for today"s busy managers who are seeking to develop their organization in the right direction. Case studies on leading companies and viewpoints from some of the best thinkers in the area of organizational development and learning combine to make this journal a very welcome addition to the management literature. In addition, as part of our special service, we scour through the mass of academic and non-academic literature to ensure that we keep up to date with the best and newest ideas. We then distil this information for our readers and present the most meaningful implications for managers in easy-to-digest reviews and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信