Discours. Livres XXXIV, XXXV & XXXVI by Libanios, and: Libanius: Ten Mythological and Historical Declamations by Libanius (review)

IF 0.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Fabrizio Petorella
{"title":"Discours. Livres XXXIV, XXXV & XXXVI by Libanios, and: Libanius: Ten Mythological and Historical Declamations by Libanius (review)","authors":"Fabrizio Petorella","doi":"10.1353/rht.2023.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"book would be superior to Johnson’s as a mobilization of the history of the arts of memory for the present. And I do think Long’s book is the better one. That said, a longer and deeper history makes for more labor and more liability. Such investments can make it all the more difficult to pivot quickly at the end of a book to “the now” in ways that do justice to both the history and the now. Just so, at the end of Long’s book we encounter some fairly thin optimism about the work of “curation” that goes into “social media” accounts. There are particular platforms that make this possible more than others. (Think of Pinterest, for example; and think of Pinterest as read through the history of rhetoric by Cory Geraths and Michele Kennerly.) But as soon as we mention the image table made possible by Pinterest as a platform and think of it, as I imagine Long would have us do, as a digital memory palace, we recognize the litany of problems that emerge in environments generated by the specific procedures and affordances of other apps. Sure, my Facebook memory palace—construct the phrase, see the problem—is informed by my clicking in some ways, but most of the “curation” here is algorithmic, hidden, and not mine. Will “my” digital memory palace be a memory infrastructure dedicated more to the infinite doom scrolling of a permanent hyperpresent (Twitter, maybe), or will it be an environment that facilitates practices of commonplacing for oneself and other specific or even local communities (Roam Research, perhaps)? Like all the best media critics, we should refuse both blanket optimism and blanket pessimism and attend instead to the articulation of specific exclusions, constraints, and possibilities. The books from Johnson and Long attest to the importance of a long durée approach to memory studies that draws on the history of rhetoric, but they also both demonstrate the degree of difficulty involved in such research.","PeriodicalId":40200,"journal":{"name":"Res Rhetorica","volume":"335 1","pages":"104 - 107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Res Rhetorica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rht.2023.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

book would be superior to Johnson’s as a mobilization of the history of the arts of memory for the present. And I do think Long’s book is the better one. That said, a longer and deeper history makes for more labor and more liability. Such investments can make it all the more difficult to pivot quickly at the end of a book to “the now” in ways that do justice to both the history and the now. Just so, at the end of Long’s book we encounter some fairly thin optimism about the work of “curation” that goes into “social media” accounts. There are particular platforms that make this possible more than others. (Think of Pinterest, for example; and think of Pinterest as read through the history of rhetoric by Cory Geraths and Michele Kennerly.) But as soon as we mention the image table made possible by Pinterest as a platform and think of it, as I imagine Long would have us do, as a digital memory palace, we recognize the litany of problems that emerge in environments generated by the specific procedures and affordances of other apps. Sure, my Facebook memory palace—construct the phrase, see the problem—is informed by my clicking in some ways, but most of the “curation” here is algorithmic, hidden, and not mine. Will “my” digital memory palace be a memory infrastructure dedicated more to the infinite doom scrolling of a permanent hyperpresent (Twitter, maybe), or will it be an environment that facilitates practices of commonplacing for oneself and other specific or even local communities (Roam Research, perhaps)? Like all the best media critics, we should refuse both blanket optimism and blanket pessimism and attend instead to the articulation of specific exclusions, constraints, and possibilities. The books from Johnson and Long attest to the importance of a long durée approach to memory studies that draws on the history of rhetoric, but they also both demonstrate the degree of difficulty involved in such research.
这本书在动员记忆艺术的历史方面要优于约翰逊的书。我确实认为朗的书更好。也就是说,历史越长、越深,就越需要付出更多的劳动和承担更多的责任。这样的投资会让你更难在书的最后迅速转向“现在”,以一种既公正地对待历史又公正地对待现在的方式。正是如此,在朗的书的最后,我们对“社交媒体”账户中的“策展”工作感到些许乐观。有一些特定的平台比其他平台更有可能实现这一点。(比如Pinterest;把Pinterest看作是读过科里·杰拉斯和米歇尔·肯纳利的修辞学史。)但是,一旦我们提到Pinterest作为一个平台实现的图像表,并把它想象成一个数字记忆宫殿(我想朗希望我们这么做),我们就会意识到,在其他应用程序的特定程序和功能所产生的环境中,会出现一连串的问题。当然,我的Facebook记忆宫殿——构建这个短语,看看问题所在——是通过我的点击在某种程度上获知的,但这里的大多数“管理”都是算法的,隐藏的,而不是我的。“我的”数字记忆宫殿会成为一个记忆基础设施,更多地致力于永久超存在的无限厄运滚动(也许是Twitter),还是会成为一个环境,促进自己和其他特定甚至当地社区的共性实践(也许是漫游研究)?像所有最好的媒体评论家一样,我们应该拒绝笼统的乐观主义和笼统的悲观主义,而是关注具体的排除、限制和可能性。约翰逊和朗的书证明了利用修辞学历史的长期记忆研究方法的重要性,但它们也都表明了这类研究的难度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Res Rhetorica
Res Rhetorica HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信