Comparative Analysis of Techniques for Testing Object Oriented Programs

Tamara Zivkovic, M. Zivkovic
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Techniques for Testing Object Oriented Programs","authors":"Tamara Zivkovic, M. Zivkovic","doi":"10.1109/ZINC50678.2020.9161799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software testing is one of the most important activities in the software development lifecycle. White box testing assumes access to the source code of the program. One of the main problems when selecting a testing approach is to try to minimize the number of tests while guaranteeing 100% test coverage.The testing of object-oriented programs is more complex than the testing of procedural programs. All traditional testing techniques can be applied, however, it is required to consider special characteristics of object-oriented programs, such as abstraction. Several techniques can be applied to the testing of the object-oriented programs – in this paper we have selected and compared two approaches and applied them to the same object-oriented program sample. Generated test sets were analyzed in terms of coverage quality with the PIT tool for mutation testing.","PeriodicalId":6731,"journal":{"name":"2020 Zooming Innovation in Consumer Technologies Conference (ZINC)","volume":"47 3 1","pages":"270-275"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 Zooming Innovation in Consumer Technologies Conference (ZINC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ZINC50678.2020.9161799","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Software testing is one of the most important activities in the software development lifecycle. White box testing assumes access to the source code of the program. One of the main problems when selecting a testing approach is to try to minimize the number of tests while guaranteeing 100% test coverage.The testing of object-oriented programs is more complex than the testing of procedural programs. All traditional testing techniques can be applied, however, it is required to consider special characteristics of object-oriented programs, such as abstraction. Several techniques can be applied to the testing of the object-oriented programs – in this paper we have selected and compared two approaches and applied them to the same object-oriented program sample. Generated test sets were analyzed in terms of coverage quality with the PIT tool for mutation testing.
面向对象程序测试技术的比较分析
软件测试是软件开发生命周期中最重要的活动之一。白盒测试假定可以访问程序的源代码。选择测试方法时的一个主要问题是尽量减少测试的数量,同时保证100%的测试覆盖率。面向对象程序的测试比过程程序的测试更复杂。所有传统的测试技术都可以应用,但是需要考虑面向对象程序的特殊特性,例如抽象。有几种技术可以应用于面向对象程序的测试——在本文中,我们选择并比较了两种方法,并将它们应用于同一个面向对象程序样本。根据突变测试的PIT工具的覆盖率质量分析生成的测试集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信