Balancing the evidence: incorporating the synthesis of qualitative data into systematic reviews

A. Pearson
{"title":"Balancing the evidence: incorporating the synthesis of qualitative data into systematic reviews","authors":"A. Pearson","doi":"10.1111/J.1479-6988.2004.00008.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Techniques for the systematic review of evidence of effectiveness are now well established. Health-care professionals argue, however, for a need to recognise evidence of appropriateness and feasibility and for the development of methodologies to appraise and synthesise the results of qualitative research. This paper describes a participatory project designed to develop systems to systematically review qualitative evidence. The Q ualitative Assessment and Review Instrument is described in detail, and a suite of programs designed to conduct comprehensive reviews of evidence for health-care practice is outlined. As evidence-based practice increases in sophistication, and its influence in health service delivery expands, the need for broadening the view of what constitutes legitimate evidence is advanced by clinicians and the approach described attempts to achieve a balance in evidence review that recognises the value of quantitative and qualitative evidence.","PeriodicalId":100738,"journal":{"name":"JBI Reports","volume":"91 1","pages":"45-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"264","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1479-6988.2004.00008.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 264

Abstract

Techniques for the systematic review of evidence of effectiveness are now well established. Health-care professionals argue, however, for a need to recognise evidence of appropriateness and feasibility and for the development of methodologies to appraise and synthesise the results of qualitative research. This paper describes a participatory project designed to develop systems to systematically review qualitative evidence. The Q ualitative Assessment and Review Instrument is described in detail, and a suite of programs designed to conduct comprehensive reviews of evidence for health-care practice is outlined. As evidence-based practice increases in sophistication, and its influence in health service delivery expands, the need for broadening the view of what constitutes legitimate evidence is advanced by clinicians and the approach described attempts to achieve a balance in evidence review that recognises the value of quantitative and qualitative evidence.
平衡证据:将定性数据的综合纳入系统评价
对有效性证据进行系统审查的技术现已得到很好的确立。然而,卫生保健专业人员认为,有必要承认适当性和可行性的证据,并制定评价和综合定性研究结果的方法。本文描述了一个参与性项目,旨在开发系统来系统地审查定性证据。详细描述了Q定性评估和审查工具,并概述了一套旨在对卫生保健实践的证据进行全面审查的方案。随着循证实践日趋复杂,其在卫生服务提供方面的影响不断扩大,临床医生提出有必要扩大对什么构成合法证据的看法,所描述的方法试图在证据审查中实现平衡,承认定量和定性证据的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信