Making and Unmaking: The Achaean Wall and the Limits of Fictionality in Homeric Criticism

IF 0.7 1区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
J. Porter, Miguel Herrero de Jáuregui, J. Heath, M. Boatwright, R. Pogorzelski, Tim Stover, G. Ruffini
{"title":"Making and Unmaking: The Achaean Wall and the Limits of Fictionality in Homeric Criticism","authors":"J. Porter, Miguel Herrero de Jáuregui, J. Heath, M. Boatwright, R. Pogorzelski, Tim Stover, G. Ruffini","doi":"10.1353/APA.2011.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Achaean wall is a curious object that appears in Iliad 7 only to disappear in book 12 with a vehemence that is unique in the Homeric landscape. Puzzling in every other respect, is the wall even a single, coherent object? While the Alexandrians and their successors accepted Nestor's proposal and the construction of the wall as genuinely Homeric, modern critics of the analytic persuasion assume it must be an interpolation. This essay takes its cues from the ancient sources, which I believe indicate the most fruitful way of reading the episode and the wall generally—namely, as an object lesson in Homeric fictionality and its limits in the minds of successive readers of the Homeric poems.","PeriodicalId":46223,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the American Philological Association","volume":"580 1","pages":"1 - 104 - 105 - 141 - 143 - 170 - 171 - 200 - 201 - 225 - 227 - 227 - 36 - 37 - 68 - 69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the American Philological Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/APA.2011.0003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

The Achaean wall is a curious object that appears in Iliad 7 only to disappear in book 12 with a vehemence that is unique in the Homeric landscape. Puzzling in every other respect, is the wall even a single, coherent object? While the Alexandrians and their successors accepted Nestor's proposal and the construction of the wall as genuinely Homeric, modern critics of the analytic persuasion assume it must be an interpolation. This essay takes its cues from the ancient sources, which I believe indicate the most fruitful way of reading the episode and the wall generally—namely, as an object lesson in Homeric fictionality and its limits in the minds of successive readers of the Homeric poems.
制造与破坏:亚该亚城墙与荷马批评中虚构的局限
亚该亚城墙是一个奇怪的物体,出现在《伊利亚特》第7章,但在第12章却消失了,其激烈程度在荷马史诗中是独一无二的。在其他方面令人费解的是,这堵墙甚至是一个单一的、连贯的物体吗?虽然亚历山大人和他们的后继者接受了内斯特的建议,并将长城的建造作为真正的荷马式的,但分析说服的现代批评者认为它一定是一种插值。本文从古代文献中获取线索,我认为这是阅读这一情节和城墙的最有效的方法,也就是说,作为荷马虚构性及其在荷马诗歌后续读者心中的局限性的客观教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Transactions of the APA (TAPA) is the official research publication of the American Philological Association. TAPA reflects the wide range and high quality of research currently undertaken by classicists. Highlights of every issue include: The Presidential Address from the previous year"s conference and Paragraphoi a reflection on the material and response to issues raised in the issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信