Valor de la imagenología (TC y PET-TC) en el diagnóstico de la carcinomatosis peritoneal. Estudio preliminar

IF 0.1 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Á. Castro, Leandro Telles, Gabriela Rodríguez Cantera, D. González, F. González, L. R. Martínez
{"title":"Valor de la imagenología (TC y PET-TC) en el diagnóstico de la carcinomatosis peritoneal. Estudio preliminar","authors":"Á. Castro, Leandro Telles, Gabriela Rodríguez Cantera, D. González, F. González, L. R. Martínez","doi":"10.29193/rmu.36.2.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Imagenology contributes to the accurate diagnosis of peritoneal compromise in the assessment of peritoneal carcinomatosis, although its effectiveness is still limited. CT is the most frequently used study and PET/CT is graduallly more requested in the assessment of different neoplasms. This study aims to assess performance of CT and PET/CT for diagnosis of peritoneal carcinomatosis in digestive and gynecological tumours.Method: retrospective, observational study of 11 cases operated on peritoneal carcinomatosis after a CT and/or PET/CT had been performed. The results of both image studies were analysed separately and altogether and they were subsequently compared to intraoperative and pathology studies.Results: CT matched findings in 8 out of 10 cases (sensitivity 78%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, negative predictive value 33%), whereas PET/TC matched in 9 out of 11 patients (sensitivity 100%, PPV 81%). When considered together, sensitivity was 100% y el PPV de 82%.Conclusions: the results of the study confirm imagenology studies overestimate peritoneal carcinomatosis based on the characteristics of nodules and its uptake pattern. In CT/PET, SUV> 6 could increase the probability of diagnosing carcinomatosis. This small series of cases enables our suggesting CT and 18F-FDG PET-TC to be requested and analysed together to increase its efficiency, although surgical exploration continues to be the most effective method to diagnose and assess peritoneal carcinomatosis.","PeriodicalId":51931,"journal":{"name":"Revista Medica del Uruguay","volume":"185 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Medica del Uruguay","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29193/rmu.36.2.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Imagenology contributes to the accurate diagnosis of peritoneal compromise in the assessment of peritoneal carcinomatosis, although its effectiveness is still limited. CT is the most frequently used study and PET/CT is graduallly more requested in the assessment of different neoplasms. This study aims to assess performance of CT and PET/CT for diagnosis of peritoneal carcinomatosis in digestive and gynecological tumours.Method: retrospective, observational study of 11 cases operated on peritoneal carcinomatosis after a CT and/or PET/CT had been performed. The results of both image studies were analysed separately and altogether and they were subsequently compared to intraoperative and pathology studies.Results: CT matched findings in 8 out of 10 cases (sensitivity 78%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, negative predictive value 33%), whereas PET/TC matched in 9 out of 11 patients (sensitivity 100%, PPV 81%). When considered together, sensitivity was 100% y el PPV de 82%.Conclusions: the results of the study confirm imagenology studies overestimate peritoneal carcinomatosis based on the characteristics of nodules and its uptake pattern. In CT/PET, SUV> 6 could increase the probability of diagnosing carcinomatosis. This small series of cases enables our suggesting CT and 18F-FDG PET-TC to be requested and analysed together to increase its efficiency, although surgical exploration continues to be the most effective method to diagnose and assess peritoneal carcinomatosis.
影像学(ct和pet - ct)在腹膜癌诊断中的价值。初步研究
在腹膜癌的评估中,影像学有助于腹膜损害的准确诊断,尽管其有效性仍然有限。CT是最常用的研究,PET/CT在不同肿瘤的评估中逐渐被越来越多地要求。本研究旨在评估CT和PET/CT在消化道和妇科肿瘤腹膜癌病诊断中的表现。方法:对11例经CT及/或PET/CT行腹膜癌手术的患者进行回顾性观察研究。两种图像研究的结果分别分析和综合分析,并随后与术中和病理研究进行比较。结果:10例患者中CT匹配8例(敏感性78%,特异性100%,阳性预测值100%,阴性预测值33%),而11例患者中PET/TC匹配9例(敏感性100%,PPV 81%)。综合考虑,灵敏度为100%,而PPV为82%。结论:本研究结果证实影像学研究基于结节的特征及其摄取模式高估了腹膜癌。在CT/PET上,SUV bbbb6可提高癌变的诊断概率。尽管手术探查仍然是诊断和评估腹膜癌最有效的方法,但这一小部分病例使我们建议将CT和18F-FDG PET-TC结合起来进行分析,以提高其效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Medica del Uruguay
Revista Medica del Uruguay MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
50.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信