The Feasibility Study of Reservoir Geomechanics from Brittleness Evaluation

Benyamin Elilaski Nababan, H. Hutami, F. Fatkhan
{"title":"The Feasibility Study of Reservoir Geomechanics from Brittleness Evaluation","authors":"Benyamin Elilaski Nababan, H. Hutami, F. Fatkhan","doi":"10.29017/scog.45.1.920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A detailed understanding regarding the rocks Brittleness Index is helpful in oil and gas exploration as upfront information to determine the rock fracture gradient. Researchers have proposed several methods to estimate the rock Brittleness Index. However, different ways may yield different results and lead to varying interpretations regarding the Brittleness Index classifi cation. This paper evaluates the Brittleness Index of an Indonesian gas well using three approaches based on the elastic properties log data, elastic properties rock physics modeling, and mineralogical rock physics modeling to assess the consistency of the methods. The results obtained in this study suggest that elastic properties-based and mineralogical methods produced a consistent Brittleness Index. However, the vertical resolution is different. It indicates that the Brittleness Index estimated from the actual log data showed higher resolution than the Brittleness Index calculated from the rock physics modeling. Combining TOC data with the Brittleness Index is recommended to optimize hydraulic fracturing design and planning. For further investigation, the authors will be suggesting direct sampling from cores and laboratory measurements to obtain the in-situ mechanical properties of shale rocks.","PeriodicalId":21649,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas","volume":"54 37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29017/scog.45.1.920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A detailed understanding regarding the rocks Brittleness Index is helpful in oil and gas exploration as upfront information to determine the rock fracture gradient. Researchers have proposed several methods to estimate the rock Brittleness Index. However, different ways may yield different results and lead to varying interpretations regarding the Brittleness Index classifi cation. This paper evaluates the Brittleness Index of an Indonesian gas well using three approaches based on the elastic properties log data, elastic properties rock physics modeling, and mineralogical rock physics modeling to assess the consistency of the methods. The results obtained in this study suggest that elastic properties-based and mineralogical methods produced a consistent Brittleness Index. However, the vertical resolution is different. It indicates that the Brittleness Index estimated from the actual log data showed higher resolution than the Brittleness Index calculated from the rock physics modeling. Combining TOC data with the Brittleness Index is recommended to optimize hydraulic fracturing design and planning. For further investigation, the authors will be suggesting direct sampling from cores and laboratory measurements to obtain the in-situ mechanical properties of shale rocks.
基于脆性评价的储层地质力学可行性研究
对岩石脆性指数的详细了解有助于在油气勘探中作为确定岩石破裂梯度的前期信息。研究人员提出了几种估算岩石脆性指数的方法。然而,不同的方法可能会产生不同的结果,并导致对脆性指数分类的不同解释。采用弹性测井资料、弹性岩石物理建模和矿物学岩石物理建模三种方法对印尼某气井脆性指数进行了评价,以评价方法的一致性。本研究的结果表明,基于弹性性能的方法和矿物学方法产生了一致的脆性指数。但是,垂直分辨率是不同的。这表明,利用实际测井资料估算的脆性指数比利用岩石物理模型计算的脆性指数具有更高的分辨率。建议将TOC数据与脆性指数相结合,优化水力压裂设计和规划。为了进一步研究,作者将建议直接从岩心和实验室测量中取样,以获得页岩的原位力学特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书