Preventing Central Line Bloodstream Infections: An Interdisciplinary Virtual Model for Central Line Rounding and Consultation

IF 2.6 Q1 SURGERY
Erin Lightheart, M. Guyton, Cheryl Gilmar, Jillian Tuzio, M. Ziegler, C. Kucharczuk
{"title":"Preventing Central Line Bloodstream Infections: An Interdisciplinary Virtual Model for Central Line Rounding and Consultation","authors":"Erin Lightheart, M. Guyton, Cheryl Gilmar, Jillian Tuzio, M. Ziegler, C. Kucharczuk","doi":"10.33940/med/2023.3.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Central line–associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) account for many harms suffered in healthcare and are associated with increased costs and disease burden. Central line rounds, like medical rounds, are a multidisciplinary bedside assessment strategy for all active central lines on a unit. In-person line rounds in this 144-bed oncology acute care setting are challenging due to a variety of unchangeable factors. The aim was to develop a process for addressing concerning central lines in this context. \n\nMethods: The project team designed a HIPAA-protected, text-based process for assessing central lines for risk factors contributing to infection. Staff initiated a consultation via a virtual platform with an interdisciplinary team composed of oncology and infectious diseases experts. The virtual discussion included recommendations for a line-related plan of care. \n\nResults: The number of consultations averaged about five per month, with 27.4% resulting in the central line being removed, which is believed to have contributed to an overall reduction in infection rates. The CLABSI standardized infection ratio, a risk-adjusted measure which accounts for patient acuity and volumes, improved from 0.85 prior to the intervention (November 2020–October 2021) to 0.57 after the intervention (November 2021–August 2022), a 33% reduction. \n\nConclusion: A virtual process for central line consultation and interdisciplinary planning was effective and, in this setting, perhaps optimal. This type of process could be applied to nearly any aspect of clinical care where teams are solving problems in an environment with complex geography and relationships.","PeriodicalId":46782,"journal":{"name":"Patient Safety in Surgery","volume":"168 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Safety in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33940/med/2023.3.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Central line–associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) account for many harms suffered in healthcare and are associated with increased costs and disease burden. Central line rounds, like medical rounds, are a multidisciplinary bedside assessment strategy for all active central lines on a unit. In-person line rounds in this 144-bed oncology acute care setting are challenging due to a variety of unchangeable factors. The aim was to develop a process for addressing concerning central lines in this context. Methods: The project team designed a HIPAA-protected, text-based process for assessing central lines for risk factors contributing to infection. Staff initiated a consultation via a virtual platform with an interdisciplinary team composed of oncology and infectious diseases experts. The virtual discussion included recommendations for a line-related plan of care. Results: The number of consultations averaged about five per month, with 27.4% resulting in the central line being removed, which is believed to have contributed to an overall reduction in infection rates. The CLABSI standardized infection ratio, a risk-adjusted measure which accounts for patient acuity and volumes, improved from 0.85 prior to the intervention (November 2020–October 2021) to 0.57 after the intervention (November 2021–August 2022), a 33% reduction. Conclusion: A virtual process for central line consultation and interdisciplinary planning was effective and, in this setting, perhaps optimal. This type of process could be applied to nearly any aspect of clinical care where teams are solving problems in an environment with complex geography and relationships.
预防中心线血流感染:一个跨学科的中心线围合和会诊虚拟模型
背景:中心线相关性血流感染(CLABSI)在医疗保健中造成许多危害,并与成本增加和疾病负担相关。中心线查房,像医疗查房一样,是一个多学科的床边评估策略,适用于一个单位所有活跃的中心线。由于各种不可改变的因素,在这个144张床位的肿瘤急症护理设置中,亲自排队查房具有挑战性。其目的是制定一个在这方面处理有关中央线路问题的进程。方法:项目组设计了一个hipaa保护的、基于文本的流程,用于评估导致感染的风险因素。工作人员通过虚拟平台与一个由肿瘤学和传染病专家组成的跨学科小组开展会诊。虚拟讨论包括对与线路相关的护理计划的建议。结果:咨询次数平均每月约5次,其中27.4%导致中央管被移除,这被认为有助于整体降低感染率。CLABSI标准化感染率(一种考虑患者敏锐度和容量的风险调整指标)从干预前(2020年11月至2021年10月)的0.85提高到干预后(2021年11月至2022年8月)的0.57,降低了33%。结论:中心咨询和跨学科规划的虚拟过程是有效的,在这种情况下,可能是最佳的。这种类型的过程几乎可以应用于临床护理的任何方面,团队在复杂的地理和关系环境中解决问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信