Implementing video group consultations in general practice during COVID-19: a qualitative study

C. Papoutsi, S. Shaw, T. Greenhalgh
{"title":"Implementing video group consultations in general practice during COVID-19: a qualitative study","authors":"C. Papoutsi, S. Shaw, T. Greenhalgh","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2021.0673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Group consultations have been gaining ground as a novel approach to service delivery. When in-person care was restricted owing to COVID-19, general practice staff began delivering group consultations remotely over video. Aim To examine how multiple interacting influences underpinned implementation and delivery of video group consultations (VGCs). Design and setting Qualitative study in general practice in England. Method a) 32 semi-structured interviews with patients, clinical, and non-clinical staff (from eight GP surgeries in total), NHS policymakers and programme managers, and other stakeholders; b) observation in relevant training and operational meetings; and c) three co-design workshops (21 participants). Thematic analysis was informed by the Planning and Evaluating Remote Consulting Services (PERCS) framework. Results In the first year of the pandemic, VGCs focused on supporting those with long-term conditions or other shared health and social needs. Most patients welcomed clinical and peer input, and the opportunity to access their practice remotely during lockdown. However, not everyone agreed to engage in group-based care or was able to access IT equipment. At practice level, significant work was needed to deliver VGCs, such as setting up the digital infrastructure, gaining team buy-in, developing new patient-facing online facilitation roles, managing background operational processes, protecting online confidentiality, and ensuring professional indemnity cover. Training provided nationally was seen as instrumental in capacity building for VGC implementation. Conclusion Small scale VGC implementation addressed unmet need during the pandemic. However, embedding VGCs in routine care requires rethinking of operational, infrastructural, and clinical processes. Additional research on costs and benefits at service and patient level is needed.","PeriodicalId":22333,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal of General Practice","volume":"244 1","pages":"e483 - e491"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2021.0673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background Group consultations have been gaining ground as a novel approach to service delivery. When in-person care was restricted owing to COVID-19, general practice staff began delivering group consultations remotely over video. Aim To examine how multiple interacting influences underpinned implementation and delivery of video group consultations (VGCs). Design and setting Qualitative study in general practice in England. Method a) 32 semi-structured interviews with patients, clinical, and non-clinical staff (from eight GP surgeries in total), NHS policymakers and programme managers, and other stakeholders; b) observation in relevant training and operational meetings; and c) three co-design workshops (21 participants). Thematic analysis was informed by the Planning and Evaluating Remote Consulting Services (PERCS) framework. Results In the first year of the pandemic, VGCs focused on supporting those with long-term conditions or other shared health and social needs. Most patients welcomed clinical and peer input, and the opportunity to access their practice remotely during lockdown. However, not everyone agreed to engage in group-based care or was able to access IT equipment. At practice level, significant work was needed to deliver VGCs, such as setting up the digital infrastructure, gaining team buy-in, developing new patient-facing online facilitation roles, managing background operational processes, protecting online confidentiality, and ensuring professional indemnity cover. Training provided nationally was seen as instrumental in capacity building for VGC implementation. Conclusion Small scale VGC implementation addressed unmet need during the pandemic. However, embedding VGCs in routine care requires rethinking of operational, infrastructural, and clinical processes. Additional research on costs and benefits at service and patient level is needed.
在COVID-19期间在全科实践中实施视频小组会诊:一项定性研究
作为一种提供服务的新方法,背景小组协商正在取得进展。当因COVID-19而限制面对面护理时,全科医生开始通过视频远程提供小组咨询。目的探讨多种相互作用的影响如何支撑视频小组咨询(vgc)的实施和交付。设计与设置英国全科医学的定性研究。方法a)对患者、临床和非临床工作人员(总共来自8个全科医生手术)、NHS政策制定者和项目经理以及其他利益相关者进行32次半结构化访谈;B)在相关培训和业务会议上的观摩;c)三个共同设计工作坊(21人)。专题分析是由规划和评价远程咨询服务框架提供的。结果:在大流行的第一年,志愿服务中心侧重于支持那些有长期疾病或其他共同卫生和社会需求的人。大多数患者欢迎临床和同行的意见,并有机会在封锁期间远程访问他们的诊所。然而,并不是每个人都同意参与以团体为基础的护理,或者能够使用IT设备。在实践层面,实现vgc需要做大量的工作,例如建立数字基础设施、获得团队支持、开发新的面向患者的在线促进角色、管理后台操作流程、保护在线机密性以及确保专业赔偿。国家提供的培训被认为有助于建立实施自愿自愿合作伙伴关系的能力。结论小规模VGC的实施解决了大流行期间未满足的需求。然而,在常规护理中嵌入vgc需要重新思考操作、基础设施和临床流程。需要对服务和患者层面的成本和效益进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信