Does gender matter for the use of learning opportunities? Potential explanation for the gender gap in financial literacy

Q2 Social Sciences
Michelle Rudeloff, T. Brahm, Marina Pumptow
{"title":"Does gender matter for the use of learning opportunities? Potential explanation for the gender gap in financial literacy","authors":"Michelle Rudeloff, T. Brahm, Marina Pumptow","doi":"10.1177/2047173419892208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Financial literacy is becoming increasingly important, in particular for adolescents since they are exposed to financial services earlier and earlier. At the same time, empirical studies indicate that male learners show higher financial literacy than women; however, other studies find significant or contrary differences between male and female learners. These partially contradictory results make it necessary to investigate such gender-specific effects in more detail. This article addresses two questions to contribute to the literature on financial literacy: first, in which financial content areas are there significant performance differences between female and male adolescents? Secondly, does the relationship between learning opportunities and financial education differ among pupils? The analyses are based on a sample of 530 secondary students from Germany. The results indicate that female students show higher test results for the financial literacy dimensions money and payments, and insurance, male students perform better regarding the dimensions savings and monetary policy. Furthermore, learning opportunities may contribute differently to the gender gaps. We contribute to the literature by investigating the important question of gender gap for five different dimensions of financial literacy and by showing that different learning opportunities play a role in the development of students’ financial literacy.","PeriodicalId":52531,"journal":{"name":"Citizenship, Social and Economics Education","volume":"13 26 1","pages":"128 - 142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Citizenship, Social and Economics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2047173419892208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Financial literacy is becoming increasingly important, in particular for adolescents since they are exposed to financial services earlier and earlier. At the same time, empirical studies indicate that male learners show higher financial literacy than women; however, other studies find significant or contrary differences between male and female learners. These partially contradictory results make it necessary to investigate such gender-specific effects in more detail. This article addresses two questions to contribute to the literature on financial literacy: first, in which financial content areas are there significant performance differences between female and male adolescents? Secondly, does the relationship between learning opportunities and financial education differ among pupils? The analyses are based on a sample of 530 secondary students from Germany. The results indicate that female students show higher test results for the financial literacy dimensions money and payments, and insurance, male students perform better regarding the dimensions savings and monetary policy. Furthermore, learning opportunities may contribute differently to the gender gaps. We contribute to the literature by investigating the important question of gender gap for five different dimensions of financial literacy and by showing that different learning opportunities play a role in the development of students’ financial literacy.
性别对学习机会的使用有影响吗?对金融知识性别差异的潜在解释
金融知识正变得越来越重要,特别是对青少年来说,因为他们接触金融服务的时间越来越早。同时,实证研究表明,男性学习者的金融素养高于女性;然而,其他研究发现男性和女性学习者之间存在显著或相反的差异。这些部分相互矛盾的结果使得有必要更详细地调查这种针对性别的影响。本文解决了两个问题,为金融素养文献做出贡献:第一,在哪些金融内容领域,女性和男性青少年之间存在显著的表现差异?其次,学习机会与金融教育之间的关系在小学生中是否存在差异?这些分析是基于德国530名中学生的样本。结果显示,女生在理财素养维度金钱与支付、保险的测试结果较高,男生在储蓄、货币政策维度的测试结果较好。此外,学习机会可能会对性别差距产生不同的影响。我们通过研究金融素养的五个不同维度的性别差距这一重要问题,并通过展示不同的学习机会在学生金融素养的发展中发挥作用,从而为文献做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Citizenship, Social and Economics Education
Citizenship, Social and Economics Education Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: Citizenship, Social and Economics Education (CSEE) is the official journal of the International Association for Citizenship, Social and Economics Education. CSEE is an online-only, peer-reviewed journal that provides a focus for scholarly and professional studies in the fields of education, socialisation, curriculum development and aspects of economics, sociology, politics and social psychology. The journal aims to bring together this range of disciplines into an enabling forum of discussion and exchange. It includes analyses of how children learn about societies, current and past, reports and accounts of current research from a variety of disciplines, as well as reporting and analysing contemporary professional practices and innovations, in curriculum and in the organisation of educational change in these areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书