Comparison of Regulatory Requirements for Filing Drug Master File (DMF) in Emerging Markets - China, Brazil & South Korea

Kunta N. Reddy, S. G. Vasantharaju
{"title":"Comparison of Regulatory Requirements for Filing Drug Master File (DMF) in Emerging Markets - China, Brazil & South Korea","authors":"Kunta N. Reddy, S. G. Vasantharaju","doi":"10.2174/2213476x06666190916122404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nA DMF consists of confidential information, usually related to Chemistry, Manufacturing\nand Control (CMC) of the drug substance. DMF is prepared and submitted by the pharmaceutical\nmanufacturer solely to the regulatory authority of the respected country where he wants to market.\n\n\n\nCompare the regulations of the emerging markets with that of a regulated market and to highlight\nthe stringent requirements imposed by emerging authorities. The similarities and differences of the\nrequirements for filing a DMF in emerging markets are compared against the regulated market.\n\n\n\nThe method carried out for every single study follows some patterns and certain pathways in\norder to reach its target. Method begins with scope and objective of regulatory perspective of DMF filing\nrequirements for USA, China, Brazil and Korea. The information was collected from Regulatory authorities,\nLegislations, Guidelines and Experts opinion.\n\n\n\nRegulatory requirements for filing a DMF for API registration vary from country to country.\nEven though a standard ICH-CTD format is available and most widely followed, there are some specific\nrequirements recommended by drug authorities which are mandatory to be provided while filing to that\nparticular country.\n\n\n\nBased on the current study it is clear that emerging markets possess more stringent requirements\nfor API approval as compared to the regulatory market but the dispute is that the emerging markets\ndo not have harmonized guidelines and are not transparent enough.\n","PeriodicalId":8525,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Research, Clinical Trials and Regulatory Affairs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Research, Clinical Trials and Regulatory Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2213476x06666190916122404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A DMF consists of confidential information, usually related to Chemistry, Manufacturing and Control (CMC) of the drug substance. DMF is prepared and submitted by the pharmaceutical manufacturer solely to the regulatory authority of the respected country where he wants to market. Compare the regulations of the emerging markets with that of a regulated market and to highlight the stringent requirements imposed by emerging authorities. The similarities and differences of the requirements for filing a DMF in emerging markets are compared against the regulated market. The method carried out for every single study follows some patterns and certain pathways in order to reach its target. Method begins with scope and objective of regulatory perspective of DMF filing requirements for USA, China, Brazil and Korea. The information was collected from Regulatory authorities, Legislations, Guidelines and Experts opinion. Regulatory requirements for filing a DMF for API registration vary from country to country. Even though a standard ICH-CTD format is available and most widely followed, there are some specific requirements recommended by drug authorities which are mandatory to be provided while filing to that particular country. Based on the current study it is clear that emerging markets possess more stringent requirements for API approval as compared to the regulatory market but the dispute is that the emerging markets do not have harmonized guidelines and are not transparent enough.
新兴市场(中国、巴西和韩国)提交药品主文件(DMF)监管要求的比较
DMF由机密信息组成,通常与原料药的化学、生产和控制(CMC)有关。DMF仅由制药商准备并提交给他想要销售的受尊重国家的监管机构。将新兴市场的监管与受监管市场的监管进行比较,并强调新兴市场当局施加的严格要求。将新兴市场提交DMF要求的异同点与受监管市场进行比较。每一项研究的方法都遵循一些模式和某些途径,以达到其目标。方法从美国、中国、巴西和韩国DMF申报要求的监管角度的范围和目标开始。这些信息是从监管机构、立法、指南和专家意见中收集的。为原料药注册提交DMF的监管要求因国家而异。尽管有一种标准的ICH-CTD格式,并得到了最广泛的遵循,但药品主管部门建议的一些具体要求在向该特定国家提交申请时必须提供。根据目前的研究,很明显,与监管市场相比,新兴市场对API批准的要求更严格,但争议在于新兴市场没有统一的指导方针,不够透明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信