Tensions in managing the online network development of autoethnographers

Q3 Social Sciences
Alec Grant, Jamie Barnes, T. Klevan, A. Donaldson
{"title":"Tensions in managing the online network development of autoethnographers","authors":"Alec Grant, Jamie Barnes, T. Klevan, A. Donaldson","doi":"10.1921/swssr.v23i2.2083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although literature exists on the methodological development of autoethnographers in the classroom context, little has been written about achieving such development in online networks of dispersed individuals, and the social psychological difficulties between senior members of such networks that might ensue. This conversational autoethnography developed after Alec Grant, the first author, angrily withdrew by email from the South Coast Autoethnography Network (SCAN). Since its inception in 2013, the hub, or centre of operating activity of SCAN has historically been mostly shared between a small number of academics working in, or associated with, Sussex University and the University of Brighton in the south coast of England. With around 65 participants, SCAN aims to facilitate the development of autoethnographers, with many of its members inexperienced in the approach to differing degrees. In their conversational exchange, the authors explore, respond to, and try to make sense of and resolve, the tensions that developed in the group before and after Alec’s withdrawal from it. The authors believe that this article captures many of the interpersonal difficulties that might inevitably arise between senior members, in autoethnographic networks internationally. They therefore hope that it will serve as a useful resource for individual readers and network groups.","PeriodicalId":53681,"journal":{"name":"Social Work and Social Sciences Review","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Work and Social Sciences Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v23i2.2083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although literature exists on the methodological development of autoethnographers in the classroom context, little has been written about achieving such development in online networks of dispersed individuals, and the social psychological difficulties between senior members of such networks that might ensue. This conversational autoethnography developed after Alec Grant, the first author, angrily withdrew by email from the South Coast Autoethnography Network (SCAN). Since its inception in 2013, the hub, or centre of operating activity of SCAN has historically been mostly shared between a small number of academics working in, or associated with, Sussex University and the University of Brighton in the south coast of England. With around 65 participants, SCAN aims to facilitate the development of autoethnographers, with many of its members inexperienced in the approach to differing degrees. In their conversational exchange, the authors explore, respond to, and try to make sense of and resolve, the tensions that developed in the group before and after Alec’s withdrawal from it. The authors believe that this article captures many of the interpersonal difficulties that might inevitably arise between senior members, in autoethnographic networks internationally. They therefore hope that it will serve as a useful resource for individual readers and network groups.
管理民族志工作者在线网络发展的紧张关系
尽管在课堂环境中存在关于自我民族志学家方法论发展的文献,但很少有关于在分散的个人的在线网络中实现这种发展的文献,以及这种网络中可能随之而来的高级成员之间的社会心理困难。在第一作者亚历克·格兰特(Alec Grant)愤怒地通过电子邮件退出南海岸自动人种志网络(SCAN)之后,这种对话式的自动人种志发展了起来。自2013年成立以来,SCAN的中心或运营活动中心一直主要由在英国南海岸的苏塞克斯大学和布莱顿大学工作或与之相关的少数学者共享。SCAN有大约65名参与者,旨在促进自我民族志学家的发展,其许多成员在不同程度上没有经验。在他们的对话交流中,作者探索,回应,并试图理解和解决,在亚历克退出之前和之后,小组中出现的紧张局势。作者认为,这篇文章抓住了许多人际关系的困难,可能不可避免地出现在高级成员之间,在国际自我民族志网络。因此,他们希望它将成为个人读者和网络团体的有用资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Work and Social Sciences Review
Social Work and Social Sciences Review Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信