Push-out bond strength of fiber posts luted using different adhesive resin cements

Suat Özcan, Serkan Aktuna, Yelda Nayir, Darendeliler Yaman, O. Bala
{"title":"Push-out bond strength of fiber posts luted using different adhesive resin cements","authors":"Suat Özcan, Serkan Aktuna, Yelda Nayir, Darendeliler Yaman, O. Bala","doi":"10.4103/2321-4619.118879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Post retention to root canal dentin is an important problem that directly affects the success of the restoration. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different adhesive resin cements on the bond strength of fiber posts to root canal dentin. Materials and Methods: A total of 44 human mandibular premolars were selected for the study. Posts were luted using four different resin cements: Group 1; RelyX Unicem, Group 2; Panavia F 2.0, Group 3; Kerr Maxcem and Group 4; Clearfil self-adhesive (SA) cement. After the cementation, three segments per tooth were obtained starting 1 mm below the cementoenamel junction including, cervical, middle and apical. The roots were sectioned into 6 slices of 1 mm thickness each. Push-out test was performed using the universal testing machine at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey′s tests (α = 0.05). Results: Mean push-out bond strengths were: RelyX Unicem (22.4 ± 2.46), Panavia F 2.0 (19.8 ± 2.01), Kerr Maxcem (18.1 ± 2.45), Clearfil SA Cement (23.8 ± 2.49). Clearfil SA Cement showed significantly higher bonds strength than the other tested materials except RelyX Unicem (P < 0.05). Conclusion: SA 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate-based resin cements yielded higher bond strength values than did self-etch or SA resin cements for fiber posts in push out tests. Bond strength values were higher in coronal than in the middle and apical root sections.","PeriodicalId":17076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Restorative Dentistry","volume":"184 1","pages":"75 - 80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2321-4619.118879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: Post retention to root canal dentin is an important problem that directly affects the success of the restoration. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different adhesive resin cements on the bond strength of fiber posts to root canal dentin. Materials and Methods: A total of 44 human mandibular premolars were selected for the study. Posts were luted using four different resin cements: Group 1; RelyX Unicem, Group 2; Panavia F 2.0, Group 3; Kerr Maxcem and Group 4; Clearfil self-adhesive (SA) cement. After the cementation, three segments per tooth were obtained starting 1 mm below the cementoenamel junction including, cervical, middle and apical. The roots were sectioned into 6 slices of 1 mm thickness each. Push-out test was performed using the universal testing machine at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey′s tests (α = 0.05). Results: Mean push-out bond strengths were: RelyX Unicem (22.4 ± 2.46), Panavia F 2.0 (19.8 ± 2.01), Kerr Maxcem (18.1 ± 2.45), Clearfil SA Cement (23.8 ± 2.49). Clearfil SA Cement showed significantly higher bonds strength than the other tested materials except RelyX Unicem (P < 0.05). Conclusion: SA 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate-based resin cements yielded higher bond strength values than did self-etch or SA resin cements for fiber posts in push out tests. Bond strength values were higher in coronal than in the middle and apical root sections.
不同粘结树脂水泥对纤维桩的推出粘结强度的影响
背景:根管后牙本质固位是直接影响根管修复成功与否的重要问题。本研究的目的是评估不同黏附树脂水泥对纤维桩与根管牙本质黏附强度的影响。材料与方法:选择44颗人下颌骨前磨牙进行研究。采用四种不同的树脂胶结剂对桩进行粘接:第一组;RelyX Unicem,第二组;Panavia f2.0,第3组;Kerr Maxcem和第4组;清洁自粘(SA)水泥。粘接后,从牙髓-牙釉质交界处以下1mm处开始,每颗牙获得三个节段,包括颈节段、中节段和根尖节段。根切成6片,每片厚度为1mm。采用万能试验机以0.5 mm/min的十字头速度进行推出试验。统计学分析采用单因素方差分析和Tukey检验(α = 0.05)。结果:平均推出强度为:RelyX Unicem(22.4±2.46),Panavia F 2.0(19.8±2.01),Kerr Maxcem(18.1±2.45),Clearfil SA Cement(23.8±2.49)。除RelyX Unicem外,Clearfil SA Cement的粘结强度显著高于其他材料(P < 0.05)。结论:采用SA - 10-甲基丙烯酰氧十二基磷酸二氢酯树脂胶结剂进行纤维桩推拔试验,其粘结强度值高于自蚀刻或SA树脂胶结剂。冠状根的粘结强度高于中根和根尖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信