PAIDEIA AS A BASIC IDEA OF XENOPHON’S "CYROPAEDIA" AND HERODIAN’S "HISTORY…"

Lesia Zvonska, F. Dovbyshchenko
{"title":"PAIDEIA AS A BASIC IDEA OF XENOPHON’S \"CYROPAEDIA\" AND HERODIAN’S \"HISTORY…\"","authors":"Lesia Zvonska, F. Dovbyshchenko","doi":"10.17721/1728-2659.2023.34.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The results of the study of the main positions of the philosophical-ethical and political dimension of the concept of education (paideia) in Xenophon's \"Cyropedia\" and Herodian's \"History of the Roman State after Marcus Aurelius\" are presented. The research methodology of the ancient biographical and historiographical text is briefly substantiated. The narrative strategies of the representation of the principles of education in both works are described in a comparative aspect. The structure of communication and ways of implementing the author's narrative strategy are analyzed through the prism of the cross-cutting idea of both works: the absolute influence of the role of the education of the ruler on the education of society. The concept of paideia is considered as a key meaning-forming element of both works; it is illustrated how the texts of Xenophon and Herodian present paideia as the main condition for the success of the ruler and his state. Common and distinctive features of the implementation of the author's narrative strategy in both works were revealed. Techniques for implementing the author's narrative strategy in the texts of Xenophon and Herodian are illustrated with examples from the original texts with translation. The example of both texts shows the durability of the traditions of writing ancient historiographic biography from the classical to the Hellenistic-Roman era: the similarity of the narrative structure, the presence of two-level communication (author's and narrator's), plot vicissitudes, the location of which in both texts coincides with the place of the golden intersection. It is proved that the texts of Xenophon and Herodian, separated from each other by a rather significant period of time of half a millennium, pursue the same goal: showing the disfunctionality of both an individual and society in general, which deviated from the principles of paideia. The elements of the narrative structure of ancient historiographical texts described in the article testify to its similarity to the structure of ancient tragedy (according to Aristotle).","PeriodicalId":33822,"journal":{"name":"Visnik Kiivs''kij nacional''nij universitet imeni Tarasa Sevcenka Istoria","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visnik Kiivs''kij nacional''nij universitet imeni Tarasa Sevcenka Istoria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2659.2023.34.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The results of the study of the main positions of the philosophical-ethical and political dimension of the concept of education (paideia) in Xenophon's "Cyropedia" and Herodian's "History of the Roman State after Marcus Aurelius" are presented. The research methodology of the ancient biographical and historiographical text is briefly substantiated. The narrative strategies of the representation of the principles of education in both works are described in a comparative aspect. The structure of communication and ways of implementing the author's narrative strategy are analyzed through the prism of the cross-cutting idea of both works: the absolute influence of the role of the education of the ruler on the education of society. The concept of paideia is considered as a key meaning-forming element of both works; it is illustrated how the texts of Xenophon and Herodian present paideia as the main condition for the success of the ruler and his state. Common and distinctive features of the implementation of the author's narrative strategy in both works were revealed. Techniques for implementing the author's narrative strategy in the texts of Xenophon and Herodian are illustrated with examples from the original texts with translation. The example of both texts shows the durability of the traditions of writing ancient historiographic biography from the classical to the Hellenistic-Roman era: the similarity of the narrative structure, the presence of two-level communication (author's and narrator's), plot vicissitudes, the location of which in both texts coincides with the place of the golden intersection. It is proved that the texts of Xenophon and Herodian, separated from each other by a rather significant period of time of half a millennium, pursue the same goal: showing the disfunctionality of both an individual and society in general, which deviated from the principles of paideia. The elements of the narrative structure of ancient historiographical texts described in the article testify to its similarity to the structure of ancient tragedy (according to Aristotle).
Paideia作为色诺芬的“cyropaedia”和希律王的“history”的基本概念…
在色诺芬的《塞浦路斯百科全书》和希律王的《马可·奥勒留之后的罗马国史》中,对教育概念(paideia)的哲学-伦理和政治维度的主要立场进行了研究。简要阐述了古代传记史学文本的研究方法。从比较的角度阐述了两部作品对教育原则的叙事策略。通过两部作品的交叉思想——统治者的教育对社会教育的绝对影响——来分析作者叙事策略的传播结构和实施方式。语意的概念被认为是两部作品的关键意义构成要素;它说明了色诺芬和希律的文本如何将paideia作为统治者及其国家成功的主要条件。揭示了作者在两部作品中运用叙事策略的共同之处和各自的特点。本文以色诺芬和希律的文本为例,通过翻译说明作者在文本中运用叙事策略的技巧。这两个文本的例子表明,从古典时代到希腊罗马时代,古代历史传记写作传统的持久性:叙事结构的相似性,两层交流(作者和叙述者)的存在,情节的变迁,这两个文本的位置都与黄金交叉点的位置一致。事实证明,色诺芬和希律的文本,彼此相隔了半个世纪的相当重要的时期,追求同样的目标:显示个人和社会的一般功能失调,这偏离了paideia的原则。本文所描述的古代史学文本的叙事结构的要素证明了其与古代悲剧结构的相似性(根据亚里士多德)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信