Technology of Multilevel Interuniversity Indicators as a Factor for Increasing Academic Mobility. Experience Based on Russian Federal Educational Standards

Q1 Social Sciences
A. Snegurenko, S. S. Zaydullin, S. Novikova, N. Valitova, E. S. Kremleva
{"title":"Technology of Multilevel Interuniversity Indicators as a Factor for Increasing Academic Mobility. Experience Based on Russian Federal Educational Standards","authors":"A. Snegurenko, S. S. Zaydullin, S. Novikova, N. Valitova, E. S. Kremleva","doi":"10.15507/1991-9468.106.026.202201.055-071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. At the present time, more and more students are changing either their field of study or the university in the process of studying. This raises the problem of how to determine whether a student’s level of knowledge meets the host institution’s criteria. A simple comparison of competencies is not enough. Therefore, the authors propose a new system of comparing existing and required knowledge (competencies) at the new place of study. The purpose of this article is to present the results of research on the development and practical application of specific “competency trees” that allow for the automatic comparison and re-crediting of disciplines.\nMaterials and Methods. The research is based on the methods of system analysis for weakly formalized problems: the method of expert evaluations and the method of the goal tree. For direct development the method of construction of binary decision trees was used. To evaluate the effectiveness of the developed method, methods of observation and comparison were used.\nResults. This article describes the specific steps for creating checklists based on multilevel competency indicator trees. The tables describe the four levels of competency acquisition. Based on the experiments carried out on the use of such tables for retake disciplines when transferring a student from one specialty to another, the following recommendations are made: if it is necessary to obtain a mark of the “Test” type in the Host University, the comparison is made according to the second level indicators; if it is necessary to obtain a mark of the type “Graded test/Test with a grade” in the Host University, the comparison is made according to the third level indicators; if it is necessary to obtain a mark of the “Exam” type in the Host University, the comparison is made according to the indicators of the deepest level for this indicator of the first level. The technique has been successfully tested for moving of a student within Kazan National Research Technical University named after A. N. Tupolev-KAI between the academic programs Aircraft Engineering and Applied Mathematics and Informatics.\nDiscussion and Conclusion. The proposed multilevel system of interuniversity indicators will significantly simplify the procedure for transferring subjects for students who are moved from one study program to another at any level – whether within one university, or between different universities of the Russian Federation. The use of an automated system for comparing the level of knowledge of a student when moving from one university to another will not only reduce the time of a student and teachers, but also eliminate the human factor, bias and subjectivity in the process of making decisions about transferring, and increase the transparency of this process. All this together will contribute to the development of academic mobility of students, increasing their competitiveness in the labor market and strengthening academic interuniversity relationships both in Russia and abroad.","PeriodicalId":53450,"journal":{"name":"Integration of Education","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integration of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.106.026.202201.055-071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction. At the present time, more and more students are changing either their field of study or the university in the process of studying. This raises the problem of how to determine whether a student’s level of knowledge meets the host institution’s criteria. A simple comparison of competencies is not enough. Therefore, the authors propose a new system of comparing existing and required knowledge (competencies) at the new place of study. The purpose of this article is to present the results of research on the development and practical application of specific “competency trees” that allow for the automatic comparison and re-crediting of disciplines. Materials and Methods. The research is based on the methods of system analysis for weakly formalized problems: the method of expert evaluations and the method of the goal tree. For direct development the method of construction of binary decision trees was used. To evaluate the effectiveness of the developed method, methods of observation and comparison were used. Results. This article describes the specific steps for creating checklists based on multilevel competency indicator trees. The tables describe the four levels of competency acquisition. Based on the experiments carried out on the use of such tables for retake disciplines when transferring a student from one specialty to another, the following recommendations are made: if it is necessary to obtain a mark of the “Test” type in the Host University, the comparison is made according to the second level indicators; if it is necessary to obtain a mark of the type “Graded test/Test with a grade” in the Host University, the comparison is made according to the third level indicators; if it is necessary to obtain a mark of the “Exam” type in the Host University, the comparison is made according to the indicators of the deepest level for this indicator of the first level. The technique has been successfully tested for moving of a student within Kazan National Research Technical University named after A. N. Tupolev-KAI between the academic programs Aircraft Engineering and Applied Mathematics and Informatics. Discussion and Conclusion. The proposed multilevel system of interuniversity indicators will significantly simplify the procedure for transferring subjects for students who are moved from one study program to another at any level – whether within one university, or between different universities of the Russian Federation. The use of an automated system for comparing the level of knowledge of a student when moving from one university to another will not only reduce the time of a student and teachers, but also eliminate the human factor, bias and subjectivity in the process of making decisions about transferring, and increase the transparency of this process. All this together will contribute to the development of academic mobility of students, increasing their competitiveness in the labor market and strengthening academic interuniversity relationships both in Russia and abroad.
多层次校际指标技术:促进学术流动的一个因素。基于俄罗斯联邦教育标准的经验
介绍。目前,越来越多的学生在学习的过程中改变了他们的学习领域或大学。这就提出了一个问题,即如何确定学生的知识水平是否符合接收机构的标准。简单的能力比较是不够的。因此,作者提出了一种在新的学习地点比较现有知识和所需知识(能力)的新系统。本文的目的是展示特定“能力树”的发展和实际应用的研究结果,这些研究允许学科的自动比较和重新记入学分。材料与方法。本研究基于弱形式化问题的系统分析方法:专家评价法和目标树法。为了直接展开,使用了二叉决策树的构造方法。为评价该方法的有效性,采用观察法和对比法。本文描述了基于多层能力指示树创建检查清单的具体步骤。表格描述了能力获得的四个层次。通过对专业转专业重修表使用情况的实验,提出以下建议:如需在接收院校取得“测试”类成绩,则按二级指标进行比较;如需在主办大学取得“等级考试/有等级考试”类型的分数,则按三级指标进行比较;如果需要在主办大学获得“考试”类型的分数,则根据最深层的指标对第一级的该指标进行比较。该技术已经成功地测试了喀山国立研究技术大学以a . N. Tupolev-KAI命名的一名学生在学术课程飞机工程和应用数学和信息学之间的移动。讨论与结论。拟议的多级大学间指标系统将大大简化学生从一个学习项目转到另一个学习项目的任何级别的程序-无论是在一所大学内还是在俄罗斯联邦不同的大学之间。使用自动化系统来比较学生从一所大学转到另一所大学时的知识水平,不仅可以减少学生和教师的时间,还可以消除转学决策过程中的人为因素、偏见和主观性,并增加这一过程的透明度。所有这些都将有助于发展学生的学术流动性,提高他们在劳动力市场上的竞争力,并加强俄罗斯国内外大学之间的学术关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Integration of Education
Integration of Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal was established by the resolution of the Russian Federation State Committee on Higher Education, the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation, the State Assembly and Government of Republic of Mordovia of 12 July 1995. Integration of Education publishes original researches in the field of integration of education. The names and content of the Journal’s sections correspond to the fields of science and groups of specialties of scientific workers in accordance with the Nomenclature of Scientific Specialties in which academic degrees are awarded: 19.00.00 PSYCHOLOGY 13.00.00 PEDAGOGY 22.00.00 SOCIOLOGY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信