Propylene Glycol Today

J. Vilaplana, M. Alsina, J. Coll, J. Reig, G. Campos, C. Trullás, C. Pelejero, M. Recasens, D. Costa, C. Romaguera
{"title":"Propylene Glycol Today","authors":"J. Vilaplana, M. Alsina, J. Coll, J. Reig, G. Campos, C. Trullás, C. Pelejero, M. Recasens, D. Costa, C. Romaguera","doi":"10.1159/000092606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Propylene glycol (PG) has been described as responsible for contact allergy and irritant reactions, but there are a lot of non-conclusive studies reporting a different percentage of patients irritated, with diverse concentrations and doses applied. As this substance is contained in a large amount of products, we reviewed its irritant capacity and the appropriate concentration to be tested. PG from two different origins was tested in 230 healthy volunteers. We applied 25 µl of PG at two different concentrations (70 and 100%). PG from origin B (PGB) was tested furthermore with two different qualities. Biophysical measurements were performed in those subjects patch-tested with PGB and its acute dermal irritation was tested in human skin culture. After 48 h results did not show any difference between PG from both origins and qualities. After 96 h PGB was slightly more irritant than PGA. Biophysical measurements only increased significantly in the subjects with a positive allergic reaction and there were no differences in the in vitro test. PG is not valid as pattern of irritation even at 100% concentration because it irritates a small percentage of patients. The recommended concentration should be between 30 and 70% in water, and the 100% concentration could be used in non-reactive patients.","PeriodicalId":12086,"journal":{"name":"Exogenous Dermatology","volume":"242 1","pages":"313 - 317"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exogenous Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000092606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Propylene glycol (PG) has been described as responsible for contact allergy and irritant reactions, but there are a lot of non-conclusive studies reporting a different percentage of patients irritated, with diverse concentrations and doses applied. As this substance is contained in a large amount of products, we reviewed its irritant capacity and the appropriate concentration to be tested. PG from two different origins was tested in 230 healthy volunteers. We applied 25 µl of PG at two different concentrations (70 and 100%). PG from origin B (PGB) was tested furthermore with two different qualities. Biophysical measurements were performed in those subjects patch-tested with PGB and its acute dermal irritation was tested in human skin culture. After 48 h results did not show any difference between PG from both origins and qualities. After 96 h PGB was slightly more irritant than PGA. Biophysical measurements only increased significantly in the subjects with a positive allergic reaction and there were no differences in the in vitro test. PG is not valid as pattern of irritation even at 100% concentration because it irritates a small percentage of patients. The recommended concentration should be between 30 and 70% in water, and the 100% concentration could be used in non-reactive patients.
今天的丙二醇
丙二醇(PG)被描述为接触性过敏和刺激反应的原因,但有很多非结论性研究报告了不同比例的患者受到刺激,使用不同的浓度和剂量。由于该物质在产品中含有大量,我们审查了其刺激能力和适当的测试浓度。来自两种不同来源的PG在230名健康志愿者中进行了测试。我们以两种不同浓度(70%和100%)应用25µl PG。进一步对B产地PG (PGB)进行了两种不同品质的检测。对这些受试者进行了PGB贴片试验的生物物理测量,并在人体皮肤培养中测试了其急性皮肤刺激。48 h后的结果显示,不同产地和品质的PG之间没有任何差异。96 h后,PGB的刺激性略大于PGA。生物物理测量值仅在过敏反应阳性的受试者中显著增加,在体外试验中没有差异。即使在100%浓度下,PG也不能作为有效的刺激模式,因为它会刺激一小部分患者。在水中的推荐浓度为30 - 70%,100%浓度可用于无反应的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信