Understanding the structure and composition of co-offending networks in Australia

IF 2 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
David Bright, C. Whelan, C. Morselli
{"title":"Understanding the structure and composition of co-offending networks in Australia","authors":"David Bright, C. Whelan, C. Morselli","doi":"10.52922/ti04480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research on co-offending The literature on crime and criminal behaviour has long recognised that a large volume of criminal offending involves two or more individuals acting collaboratively. Although the true size and impact of co-offending is still not well known, previous research suggests that up to 35 percent of all crime events involve more than one offender (Carrington 2002; Hodgson 2007; van Mastrigt & Carrington 2014; van Mastrigt & Farrington 2009). Research has further demonstrated that co-offending may lead to an escalation in offending and cause more harms to victims, property and society than solo offending (Carrington 2002; Felson 2003). The study of co-offending patterns is critical to developing a comprehensive understanding of crime statistics, theories of crime and criminal careers; estimation of societal harms; and the impact of policy interventions, including deterrence, incapacitation and rehabilitation (eg McGloin et al. 2008; Morselli, Grund & Boivin 2015; Zimring 1981). Abstract | A large volume of criminal offending involves two or more individuals acting collaboratively. In recent years, much contemporary research on group crime has integrated research on co-offending with the study of criminal networks. However, while this research (mostly from the United States and Canada) is generating significant insights into co-offending, there is a notable absence of research on co-offending and co-offending networks in Australia.","PeriodicalId":45134,"journal":{"name":"Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52922/ti04480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Research on co-offending The literature on crime and criminal behaviour has long recognised that a large volume of criminal offending involves two or more individuals acting collaboratively. Although the true size and impact of co-offending is still not well known, previous research suggests that up to 35 percent of all crime events involve more than one offender (Carrington 2002; Hodgson 2007; van Mastrigt & Carrington 2014; van Mastrigt & Farrington 2009). Research has further demonstrated that co-offending may lead to an escalation in offending and cause more harms to victims, property and society than solo offending (Carrington 2002; Felson 2003). The study of co-offending patterns is critical to developing a comprehensive understanding of crime statistics, theories of crime and criminal careers; estimation of societal harms; and the impact of policy interventions, including deterrence, incapacitation and rehabilitation (eg McGloin et al. 2008; Morselli, Grund & Boivin 2015; Zimring 1981). Abstract | A large volume of criminal offending involves two or more individuals acting collaboratively. In recent years, much contemporary research on group crime has integrated research on co-offending with the study of criminal networks. However, while this research (mostly from the United States and Canada) is generating significant insights into co-offending, there is a notable absence of research on co-offending and co-offending networks in Australia.
了解澳大利亚共同犯罪网络的结构和组成
关于犯罪和犯罪行为的文献早就认识到,大量的刑事犯罪涉及两个或两个以上的个人合作。虽然共同犯罪的真正规模和影响仍不为人所知,但先前的研究表明,多达35%的犯罪事件涉及不止一名罪犯(Carrington 2002;霍奇森2007;van mastright & Carrington 2014;van mastright & Farrington, 2009)。研究进一步表明,与单独犯罪相比,共同犯罪可能导致犯罪升级,对受害者、财产和社会造成更大的伤害(Carrington 2002;Felson 2003)。共同犯罪模式的研究对于发展对犯罪统计、犯罪理论和犯罪职业的全面理解至关重要;社会危害评估;政策干预的影响,包括威慑、丧失行为能力和康复(如McGloin等人,2008;Morselli, Grund & Boivin 2015;Zimring 1981)。摘要|大量的犯罪行为涉及两个或两个以上的人协同行动。近年来,许多当代群体犯罪研究都将共同犯罪研究与犯罪网络研究相结合。然而,虽然这项研究(主要来自美国和加拿大)对共同犯罪产生了重要的见解,但在澳大利亚,对共同犯罪和共同犯罪网络的研究却明显缺乏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信