Breakthrough strong opioid analgesia prescription in patients using transdermal fentanyl admitted to a hospice

I. Lawrie, M. Lloyd-Williams, Esther T Waterhouse
{"title":"Breakthrough strong opioid analgesia prescription in patients using transdermal fentanyl admitted to a hospice","authors":"I. Lawrie, M. Lloyd-Williams, Esther T Waterhouse","doi":"10.1177/104990910302000101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Durogesic ® (fentanyl) patches have revolutionized pain relief, but patients still require breakthrough medication. A retrospective analysis of in-patient admission notes at a 25-bed hospice over a six-month period was carried out. Details of analgesia being used on admission for both background and breakthrough pain were obtained, and the appropriateness of the breakthrough dose for those patients using transdermal fentanyl was determined. During the study period, 278 patients were admitted to the hospice and 56 (20 percent) were using transdermal fentanyl. Of these, 35 (62 percent) were prescribed strong opioid analgesia—the dose of breakthrough medication prescribed was appropriate in 11 patients (31 percent). Rescue dosing was less than recommended, in relation to prescribed transdermal fentanyl strength, in 21 patients (60 percent) and greater than recommended in one patient (3 percent). In this study, short-acting strong opioid analgesia was not always prescribed for patients using transdermal fentanyl, and when they were prescribed, this was in the appropriate dose range in less than a third of patients.","PeriodicalId":7716,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®","volume":"184 1","pages":"1 - 2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/104990910302000101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Durogesic ® (fentanyl) patches have revolutionized pain relief, but patients still require breakthrough medication. A retrospective analysis of in-patient admission notes at a 25-bed hospice over a six-month period was carried out. Details of analgesia being used on admission for both background and breakthrough pain were obtained, and the appropriateness of the breakthrough dose for those patients using transdermal fentanyl was determined. During the study period, 278 patients were admitted to the hospice and 56 (20 percent) were using transdermal fentanyl. Of these, 35 (62 percent) were prescribed strong opioid analgesia—the dose of breakthrough medication prescribed was appropriate in 11 patients (31 percent). Rescue dosing was less than recommended, in relation to prescribed transdermal fentanyl strength, in 21 patients (60 percent) and greater than recommended in one patient (3 percent). In this study, short-acting strong opioid analgesia was not always prescribed for patients using transdermal fentanyl, and when they were prescribed, this was in the appropriate dose range in less than a third of patients.
突破强阿片类镇痛处方的患者使用透皮芬太尼入院安宁疗护
Durogesic®(芬太尼)贴片已经彻底改变了疼痛缓解,但患者仍然需要突破性的药物治疗。回顾性分析了一家有25张床位的临终关怀医院在6个月期间的住院记录。获得背景痛和突破痛患者入院时使用镇痛药的详细情况,并确定透皮芬太尼患者的突破剂量是否合适。在研究期间,278名患者住进了临终关怀,其中56名(20%)使用透皮芬太尼。其中,35人(62%)服用了强效阿片类镇痛药,11人(31%)服用了合适的突破性药物。21名患者(60%)的抢救剂量低于处方透皮芬太尼剂量,1名患者(3%)的抢救剂量高于推荐剂量。在本研究中,使用透皮芬太尼的患者并不总是开短效强阿片类镇痛药,当开处方时,只有不到三分之一的患者在合适的剂量范围内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信