Sound acts: towards a sonic pragmatism

IF 0.4 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Vadim Keylin
{"title":"Sound acts: towards a sonic pragmatism","authors":"Vadim Keylin","doi":"10.1080/20551940.2020.1857622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The article makes a case for a pragmatist approach to sound studies. My starting point is the ostensible lack of language for analysing the agentic, creative and expressive aspects of sound outside of domains of speech and music. At the same time, recent aesthetic and technological developments have brought about a plethora of sound practices that defy the apparatuses of musicology and linguistic as much as they do the listening-centred perspectives of sound studies. Discussing six examples of such practices taken from interactive sound art and participatory online cultures, I sketch out possible directions for a sonic pragmatism. In the first part, I put forward three possible premises for such a theory: John Dewey’s aesthetics, G.H. Mead’s ontology of acts, and actor-network theory. In the second part, I discuss three potential categories for the analysis of sound acts – affordance, perspective, and gesture – emphasising, respectively, their material, social, and pragmatic aspects. I argue that a pragmatist epistemology can offer substantial insights into both philosophical and cultural aspects of contemporary soundmaking, suspending the familiar dichotomies of perception and production, subject and object, human and nonhuman.","PeriodicalId":53207,"journal":{"name":"Sound Studies","volume":"29 2 1","pages":"83 - 99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sound Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20551940.2020.1857622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The article makes a case for a pragmatist approach to sound studies. My starting point is the ostensible lack of language for analysing the agentic, creative and expressive aspects of sound outside of domains of speech and music. At the same time, recent aesthetic and technological developments have brought about a plethora of sound practices that defy the apparatuses of musicology and linguistic as much as they do the listening-centred perspectives of sound studies. Discussing six examples of such practices taken from interactive sound art and participatory online cultures, I sketch out possible directions for a sonic pragmatism. In the first part, I put forward three possible premises for such a theory: John Dewey’s aesthetics, G.H. Mead’s ontology of acts, and actor-network theory. In the second part, I discuss three potential categories for the analysis of sound acts – affordance, perspective, and gesture – emphasising, respectively, their material, social, and pragmatic aspects. I argue that a pragmatist epistemology can offer substantial insights into both philosophical and cultural aspects of contemporary soundmaking, suspending the familiar dichotomies of perception and production, subject and object, human and nonhuman.
声音行动:走向声音实用主义
摘要本文提出了一种实用主义的声音研究方法。我的出发点是表面上缺乏语言来分析语音和音乐领域之外声音的能动性、创造性和表达性方面。与此同时,最近的美学和技术发展带来了大量的声音实践,这些实践既违背了音乐学和语言学的仪器,也违背了声音研究中以听力为中心的观点。通过讨论互动声音艺术和参与式网络文化中的六个例子,我勾勒出了声音实用主义的可能方向。在第一部分中,我提出了这一理论的三个可能前提:杜威的美学、G.H.米德的行为本体论和行动者网络理论。在第二部分中,我讨论了声音行为分析的三个潜在类别——提供性、视角和姿态——分别强调它们的物质、社会和实用方面。我认为,实用主义认识论可以为当代声音制作的哲学和文化方面提供实质性的见解,暂停熟悉的感知和生产,主体和客体,人类和非人类的二分法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sound Studies
Sound Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信