Arterial injury in tibial fracture correlates with trauma severity and orthopaedic outcomes

Peyton H. Terry , John F. Burke , Alex J. Demers , Thomas E. Moran , David B. Weiss , John T. Stranix
{"title":"Arterial injury in tibial fracture correlates with trauma severity and orthopaedic outcomes","authors":"Peyton H. Terry ,&nbsp;John F. Burke ,&nbsp;Alex J. Demers ,&nbsp;Thomas E. Moran ,&nbsp;David B. Weiss ,&nbsp;John T. Stranix","doi":"10.1016/j.orthop.2022.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Tibia fractures are a common fracture of the lower extremity that pose increased risk for vascular injury. The clinical relevance of vascular injury, including particular vessel and number of vessels injured, remains ambiguous. In this study, we evaluate the effect of arterial injury on orthopaedic outcomes for patients with tibia fractures, while identifying trends in fracture characteristics, fixation, and plastic surgery intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This single-center retrospective cohort study performed at an academic level I trauma center included 61 patients with 62 tibia fractures undergoing computed tomography angiography (CTA) from 2010 to 2019. Patients were stratified by presence (n = 26) and absence of arterial injury (n = 36) with an average age of 43.6 years (74.2% male) and no differences in patient demographics or comorbidities. Primary outcome measures included delayed- or non-union, amputation, compartment syndrome, infection, revision fixation, and time to full weight bearing (FWB). Fracture characteristics, fixation methods, and plastics interventions were also recorded.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients with arterial injury had higher rates of open fracture (73.1% vs 44.4%, p = 0.025), infection (46.2% vs 25%, p = 0.042), and delayed- or non-union (42.3% vs 13.9%, p = 0.012). No differences were identified for revision fixation (p = 0.233), compartment syndrome (p = 0.196), amputation (p = 0.093), time to FWB (143.4 vs 109.4 days, p = 0.911) or plastic surgery intervention (p = 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Arterial injury in patients with tibia fractures is associated with higher rates of open fractures and increased risk of infection and delayed- or non-union. Higher-powered studies are required to better characterize the association between arterial injury in tibial fracture and clinical outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100994,"journal":{"name":"Orthoplastic Surgery","volume":"7 ","pages":"Pages 25-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666769X22000021/pdfft?md5=c57b3d344a268da85989558aba30ba6c&pid=1-s2.0-S2666769X22000021-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthoplastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666769X22000021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Tibia fractures are a common fracture of the lower extremity that pose increased risk for vascular injury. The clinical relevance of vascular injury, including particular vessel and number of vessels injured, remains ambiguous. In this study, we evaluate the effect of arterial injury on orthopaedic outcomes for patients with tibia fractures, while identifying trends in fracture characteristics, fixation, and plastic surgery intervention.

Methods

This single-center retrospective cohort study performed at an academic level I trauma center included 61 patients with 62 tibia fractures undergoing computed tomography angiography (CTA) from 2010 to 2019. Patients were stratified by presence (n = 26) and absence of arterial injury (n = 36) with an average age of 43.6 years (74.2% male) and no differences in patient demographics or comorbidities. Primary outcome measures included delayed- or non-union, amputation, compartment syndrome, infection, revision fixation, and time to full weight bearing (FWB). Fracture characteristics, fixation methods, and plastics interventions were also recorded.

Results

Patients with arterial injury had higher rates of open fracture (73.1% vs 44.4%, p = 0.025), infection (46.2% vs 25%, p = 0.042), and delayed- or non-union (42.3% vs 13.9%, p = 0.012). No differences were identified for revision fixation (p = 0.233), compartment syndrome (p = 0.196), amputation (p = 0.093), time to FWB (143.4 vs 109.4 days, p = 0.911) or plastic surgery intervention (p = 0.05).

Conclusions

Arterial injury in patients with tibia fractures is associated with higher rates of open fractures and increased risk of infection and delayed- or non-union. Higher-powered studies are required to better characterize the association between arterial injury in tibial fracture and clinical outcomes.

胫骨骨折动脉损伤与创伤严重程度和骨科预后相关
胫骨骨折是一种常见的下肢骨折,会增加血管损伤的风险。血管损伤的临床意义,包括特定的血管和受伤的血管数量,仍然不明确。在本研究中,我们评估了动脉损伤对胫骨骨折患者骨科预后的影响,同时确定了骨折特征、固定和整形手术干预的趋势。方法本研究是一项在学术一级创伤中心进行的单中心回顾性队列研究,纳入了2010年至2019年接受计算机断层血管造影(CTA)治疗的62例胫骨骨折患者61例。患者根据是否存在动脉损伤(n = 26)和是否存在动脉损伤(n = 36)进行分层,平均年龄为43.6岁(74.2%为男性),患者人口统计学或合合症无差异。主要结局指标包括延迟或不愈合、截肢、筋膜间室综合征、感染、翻修固定和完全负重时间(FWB)。骨折特征、固定方法和塑料干预也被记录下来。结果动脉损伤患者开放性骨折(73.1%比44.4%,p = 0.025)、感染(46.2%比25%,p = 0.042)、延迟或不愈合(42.3%比13.9%,p = 0.012)发生率较高。翻修固定(p = 0.233)、筋膜室综合征(p = 0.196)、截肢(p = 0.093)、至FWB时间(143.4 vs 109.4天,p = 0.911)或整形手术干预(p = 0.05)方面均无差异。结论胫骨骨折患者的材料损伤与开放性骨折的发生率升高、感染和延迟或不愈合的风险增加有关。需要更有力的研究来更好地描述胫骨骨折动脉损伤与临床结果之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信