Generating Contrastive Snippets for Argument Search

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Comma Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3233/FAIA220138
Milad Alshomary, Jonas Rieskamp, Henning Wachsmuth
{"title":"Generating Contrastive Snippets for Argument Search","authors":"Milad Alshomary, Jonas Rieskamp, Henning Wachsmuth","doi":"10.3233/FAIA220138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". In argument search, snippets provide an overview of the aspects discussed by the arguments retrieved for a queried controversial topic. Existing work has focused on generating snippets that are representative of an argument’s content while remaining argumentative. In this work, we argue that the snippets should also be contrastive , that is, they should highlight the aspects that make an argument unique in the context of others. Thereby, aspect diversity is increased and redundancy is reduced. We present and compare two snippet generation approaches that jointly optimize representativeness and contrastiveness. According to our experiments, both approaches have advantages, and one is able to generate representative yet sufficiently contrastive snippets.","PeriodicalId":36616,"journal":{"name":"Comma","volume":"62 1","pages":"21-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA220138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

. In argument search, snippets provide an overview of the aspects discussed by the arguments retrieved for a queried controversial topic. Existing work has focused on generating snippets that are representative of an argument’s content while remaining argumentative. In this work, we argue that the snippets should also be contrastive , that is, they should highlight the aspects that make an argument unique in the context of others. Thereby, aspect diversity is increased and redundancy is reduced. We present and compare two snippet generation approaches that jointly optimize representativeness and contrastiveness. According to our experiments, both approaches have advantages, and one is able to generate representative yet sufficiently contrastive snippets.
为参数搜索生成对比片段
. 在参数搜索中,片段提供了为所查询的有争议主题检索的参数所讨论的方面的概述。现有的工作主要集中在生成能够代表论证内容的片段,同时保持论证性。在这项工作中,我们认为片段也应该是对比的,也就是说,它们应该突出使论点在其他人的背景下独特的方面。从而增加了方面的多样性,减少了冗余。我们提出并比较了两种共同优化代表性和对比性的片段生成方法。根据我们的实验,这两种方法都有各自的优点,其中一种方法能够生成具有代表性且具有充分对比的片段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Comma
Comma Arts and Humanities-Conservation
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信