{"title":"George D. Prentice and the Whig Sense of Humor","authors":"D. Burge","doi":"10.5325/studamerhumor.8.1.0095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Scholars have recently begun reexamining the Whig Party, paying particular attention to how the party gained adherents and challenged Andrew Jackson and his acolytes. Yet few scholars have focused attention on the Whig sense of humor. Typically portrayed as more uptight than their rambunctious Democratic counterparts, Whigs were seemingly unable to find humor in a burgeoning democratic society. This article challenges that traditional portrait by examining George D. Prentice, the long-serving editor of the Louisville Journal. Although largely forgotten as a humorist, Prentice gained a national reputation for his \"hits\" that appeared daily in the pages of the Louisville Journal from 1830 to 1868. By pillorying the opposition party, Prentice found a way to joke about corruption, adultery, drunkenness, and even death. In doing so, Prentice proved that Whigs did have a sense of humor, although it largely consisted of mocking Democrats for their eccentricities and supposed moral failings.","PeriodicalId":53944,"journal":{"name":"Studies in American Humor","volume":"11 1","pages":"112 - 95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in American Humor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/studamerhumor.8.1.0095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT:Scholars have recently begun reexamining the Whig Party, paying particular attention to how the party gained adherents and challenged Andrew Jackson and his acolytes. Yet few scholars have focused attention on the Whig sense of humor. Typically portrayed as more uptight than their rambunctious Democratic counterparts, Whigs were seemingly unable to find humor in a burgeoning democratic society. This article challenges that traditional portrait by examining George D. Prentice, the long-serving editor of the Louisville Journal. Although largely forgotten as a humorist, Prentice gained a national reputation for his "hits" that appeared daily in the pages of the Louisville Journal from 1830 to 1868. By pillorying the opposition party, Prentice found a way to joke about corruption, adultery, drunkenness, and even death. In doing so, Prentice proved that Whigs did have a sense of humor, although it largely consisted of mocking Democrats for their eccentricities and supposed moral failings.
摘要:近年来,学者们开始重新审视辉格党,尤其关注辉格党如何获得追随者并挑战安德鲁·杰克逊及其追随者。然而,很少有学者关注辉格党的幽默感。辉格党通常被描绘成比他们喧闹的民主党同行更保守,似乎无法在一个蓬勃发展的民主社会中找到幽默。本文通过考察长期担任《路易斯维尔日报》(Louisville Journal)主编的乔治·d·普伦蒂斯(George D. Prentice),挑战了这种传统形象。虽然普伦蒂斯作为一个幽默家已经被人遗忘,但他在1830年至1868年期间每天出现在《路易斯维尔日报》(Louisville Journal)上的“热门段子”却赢得了全国的声誉。通过嘲弄反对党,普伦蒂斯找到了一种拿腐败、通奸、酗酒甚至死亡开玩笑的方式。通过这样做,普伦蒂斯证明了辉格党确实有幽默感,尽管它主要是嘲笑民主党人的怪癖和所谓的道德缺陷。
期刊介绍:
Welcome to the home of Studies in American Humor, the journal of the American Humor Studies Association. Founded by the American Humor Studies Association in 1974 and published continuously since 1982, StAH specializes in humanistic research on humor in America (loosely defined) because the universal human capacity for humor is always expressed within the specific contexts of time, place, and audience that research methods in the humanities strive to address. Such methods now extend well beyond the literary and film analyses that once formed the core of American humor scholarship to a wide range of critical, biographical, historical, theoretical, archival, ethnographic, and digital studies of humor in performance and public life as well as in print and other media. StAH’s expanded editorial board of specialists marks that growth. On behalf of the editorial board, I invite scholars across the humanities to submit their best work on topics in American humor and join us in advancing knowledge in the field.