Assessment of dynamic left ventricular outflow track obstruction as fluid responsiveness marker in mechanically ventilated septic patients

S. El maraghi, Rania ElHossainy, M. Samy
{"title":"Assessment of dynamic left ventricular outflow track obstruction as fluid responsiveness marker in mechanically ventilated septic patients","authors":"S. El maraghi, Rania ElHossainy, M. Samy","doi":"10.21608/ejmr.2022.252809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Background: Sepsis is life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Similar to poly trauma, acute myocardial infarction, or stroke, early identification and appropriate management in the initial hours after sepsis develops improves outcomes. In a patient with septic shock, a fluid challenge will cause an increase in stroke volume; according to the Frank-Starling curve [1] .Relative hypovolemia has been described in the setting of septic shock. However, only 50 % of patients with hemodynamic instability are fluid responsive [2] . Purpose : Assessment of Fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic shock patients according to presence of LVOT obstruction and to judge the power of prediction of other hemodynamic parameters. Methods: A prospective observational study was carried out on 50 adult mechanically ventilated patients with septic shock. Two sets of measurements were performed before and immediately after volume expansion. Cardiac output (CO), stroke volume (SV), IVC distensibility index (dIVC), LVOT velocity ( m/s ,Mean and peak pressure gradient (mmHg) were measured by transthoracic echocardiography. Fluid challenge responders were defined as patients whose cardiac output was increased ≥15 %. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was compared for each predictive parameter. Results: During the study period, LVOT obstruction was found in 18 patients (36 %). Mortality rate at 60 days was found to be higher in patients with LVOT than in patients without LVOT obstruction (75% versus 25%, p < 0.01). Around 90 % of patients with LVOT obstruction were fluid responders versus 60 % from patient without LVOT obstruction (P-value=0.04). IVC distensibility index predicts fluid responsiveness at a cutoff point 17% with a sensitivity 88% and specificity 83 %( p-value < 0.001 and AUC= 0.934) Conclusions: LVOT obstruction in the early phase of septic shock is not rare (more than one third of septic shock patients) and is associated with a high mortality rate.","PeriodicalId":11524,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Medical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejmr.2022.252809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Background: Sepsis is life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Similar to poly trauma, acute myocardial infarction, or stroke, early identification and appropriate management in the initial hours after sepsis develops improves outcomes. In a patient with septic shock, a fluid challenge will cause an increase in stroke volume; according to the Frank-Starling curve [1] .Relative hypovolemia has been described in the setting of septic shock. However, only 50 % of patients with hemodynamic instability are fluid responsive [2] . Purpose : Assessment of Fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic shock patients according to presence of LVOT obstruction and to judge the power of prediction of other hemodynamic parameters. Methods: A prospective observational study was carried out on 50 adult mechanically ventilated patients with septic shock. Two sets of measurements were performed before and immediately after volume expansion. Cardiac output (CO), stroke volume (SV), IVC distensibility index (dIVC), LVOT velocity ( m/s ,Mean and peak pressure gradient (mmHg) were measured by transthoracic echocardiography. Fluid challenge responders were defined as patients whose cardiac output was increased ≥15 %. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was compared for each predictive parameter. Results: During the study period, LVOT obstruction was found in 18 patients (36 %). Mortality rate at 60 days was found to be higher in patients with LVOT than in patients without LVOT obstruction (75% versus 25%, p < 0.01). Around 90 % of patients with LVOT obstruction were fluid responders versus 60 % from patient without LVOT obstruction (P-value=0.04). IVC distensibility index predicts fluid responsiveness at a cutoff point 17% with a sensitivity 88% and specificity 83 %( p-value < 0.001 and AUC= 0.934) Conclusions: LVOT obstruction in the early phase of septic shock is not rare (more than one third of septic shock patients) and is associated with a high mortality rate.
机械通气脓毒症患者动态左心室流出道梗阻作为液体反应性标志物的评估
背景:败血症是由宿主对感染反应失调引起的危及生命的器官功能障碍。与多发创伤、急性心肌梗死或中风类似,在脓毒症发生后的最初几个小时内进行早期识别和适当管理可以改善预后。在感染性休克患者中,液体挑战会导致脑卒中量增加;根据Frank-Starling曲线[b],在脓毒性休克的情况下出现过相对低血容量。然而,只有50%的血流动力学不稳定患者是液体反应性[2]。目的:根据LVOT阻塞情况评估通气感染性休克患者的液体反应性,并判断其他血流动力学参数的预测能力。方法:对50例成人感染性休克机械通气患者进行前瞻性观察研究。在体积膨胀之前和之后立即进行了两组测量。经胸超声心动图测量心输出量(CO)、脑卒中容积(SV)、下腔静脉扩张指数(dIVC)、左心室血流速度(m /s)、平均和峰值压力梯度(mmHg)。液体冲击应答者定义为心输出量增加≥15%的患者。比较各预测参数下的受试者工作特征曲线(AUC)面积。结果:在研究期间,18例(36%)患者发现LVOT梗阻。有LVOT的患者60天死亡率高于无LVOT阻塞的患者(75%比25%,p < 0.01)。大约90%的LVOT梗阻患者有液体反应,而没有LVOT梗阻的患者有60%有液体反应(p值=0.04)。结论:脓毒性休克早期LVOT梗阻并不罕见(超过1 / 3的脓毒性休克患者),且与高死亡率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信