The fortunes of socialist feminism

IF 1.1 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
J. Littler, Nancy Fraser
{"title":"The fortunes of socialist feminism","authors":"J. Littler, Nancy Fraser","doi":"10.3898/136266215814379664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Your new book Fortunes of Feminism -a selection of writing you’ve produced over the past 30 years -includes the 1994 essay ‘After the Family Wage’, written in 1994, in which you argued that neither the ‘universal breadwinner’ model (in which working mothers strive to emulate male employment patterns) nor the care-giver parity model (in which women are remunerated for being full-time stay-at-home mothers) is very satisfactory. Instead, you proposed the universal care-giver model in which both men and women are structurally enabled to share the load as a fairer solution. (As someone who campaigned in 1990s London for paid paternity leave, I’m extremely on board with that project). What progress do you think has been made towards that model of sharing the pleasures and pains of childcare?","PeriodicalId":45378,"journal":{"name":"SOUNDINGS","volume":"212 1","pages":"21-33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOUNDINGS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3898/136266215814379664","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Your new book Fortunes of Feminism -a selection of writing you’ve produced over the past 30 years -includes the 1994 essay ‘After the Family Wage’, written in 1994, in which you argued that neither the ‘universal breadwinner’ model (in which working mothers strive to emulate male employment patterns) nor the care-giver parity model (in which women are remunerated for being full-time stay-at-home mothers) is very satisfactory. Instead, you proposed the universal care-giver model in which both men and women are structurally enabled to share the load as a fairer solution. (As someone who campaigned in 1990s London for paid paternity leave, I’m extremely on board with that project). What progress do you think has been made towards that model of sharing the pleasures and pains of childcare?
社会主义女权主义的命运
你的新书《女权主义的命运》(fortune of Feminism)是你过去30年的作品选集,其中包括1994年的一篇文章《家庭工资之后》(After the Family Wage),你在文中认为,无论是“普遍养家糊口”模式(职业母亲努力模仿男性的就业模式),还是“照顾者平等”模式(女性作为全职全职母亲获得报酬),都不太令人满意。相反,你提出了一种普遍的照顾者模式,在这种模式中,男性和女性在结构上都能够分担负担,这是一种更公平的解决方案。(作为上世纪90年代在伦敦发起带薪陪产假运动的人,我非常支持这个项目。)你认为这种分享育儿的快乐和痛苦的模式取得了什么进展?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SOUNDINGS
SOUNDINGS HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信