The right to be born

M. Buta, Iulia Alexandra Buta
{"title":"The right to be born","authors":"M. Buta, Iulia Alexandra Buta","doi":"10.2307/j.ctt5hgzfz.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The permission for a child with malformations to be born could be considered a mistake? This is a new challenge placed on the border between ethics and law, between the force of the science and the fundamental anthropological values. In order to understand the specificity of such a situation it is necessary to evoke an already notorious case, known as the \"Perruche Judgment\", which the French justice tried to clarify. The different comments on the \"Perruche judgment” generated the repercussions of this jurisprudence. Even if a certain number of consequences deserve to be claimed relative, some of them risk being prejudicial. So, the litigation of a born child with handicaps risks generating another one, namely the appreciation of the conditions of pregnancy interruption out of therapeutic reasons.","PeriodicalId":54462,"journal":{"name":"Revista Romana De Bioetica","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Romana De Bioetica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5hgzfz.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The permission for a child with malformations to be born could be considered a mistake? This is a new challenge placed on the border between ethics and law, between the force of the science and the fundamental anthropological values. In order to understand the specificity of such a situation it is necessary to evoke an already notorious case, known as the "Perruche Judgment", which the French justice tried to clarify. The different comments on the "Perruche judgment” generated the repercussions of this jurisprudence. Even if a certain number of consequences deserve to be claimed relative, some of them risk being prejudicial. So, the litigation of a born child with handicaps risks generating another one, namely the appreciation of the conditions of pregnancy interruption out of therapeutic reasons.
出生的权利
允许一个畸形的孩子出生会被认为是一个错误吗?这是对伦理与法律之间、科学力量与基本人类学价值之间的边界提出的新挑战。为了理解这种情况的特殊性,有必要回顾一件已经臭名昭著的案件,即法国法官试图澄清的“佩鲁什判决”。对“Perruche判决”的不同评论产生了这一法理学的影响。即使有一定数量的后果是相对的,其中一些可能是有偏见的。因此,对出生残疾儿童的诉讼有可能产生另一种风险,即对因治疗原因而中断妊娠的条件的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Romana De Bioetica
Revista Romana De Bioetica 医学-医学:伦理
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信