Finding Jesus in the Storm: The Spiritual Lives of Christians with Mental Health Challenges

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Wen-Pin Leow
{"title":"Finding Jesus in the Storm: The Spiritual Lives of Christians with Mental Health Challenges","authors":"Wen-Pin Leow","doi":"10.1080/23312521.2023.2167147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"with evil, sin, or punishment (p. 103). Rather, “we need communal practices that allow us to sustain our faith” (p. 120). Christians must view one another through the imago Dei, allowing the creative capacity of God to surpass our imaginations (p. 131). Chapter 5 continues to unlink the Christian call to service from the teleological claim of a world with normalized bodies, freeing us to work toward ending suffering without following the claims of scientific domination. This leads to a significant challenge to the Church. Namely, “by welcoming and including all persons into their communities, Christian churches have the opportunity to declare something vital about the worth of human life” (p. 151). Refusing to engage at the deepest levels of metaphysics with science, as those from the Catholic tradition have, prevents the Protestant church from making claims rooted in its own ontology, and thus prevents disabled persons from experiencing the benefits of a world which sees their lives as gifts. Chapter 6 turns more deeply into natural law theology, contrasting Aquinas and Tillich to produce a “genethic” for the Church rooted in mirroring the creative justice, joy, and love which is already written into God’s creation (p. 169). The nuances here ultimately provide a link between human’s essential nature with their moral obligations, while naming the shifts necessary to connect Protestants to an otherwise typically Catholic doctrine. Chapters 7 and 8 deal with the concept and implication of all people being fundamentally gifts rather than as things to be controlled or manipulated. This requires the Church to produce spaces in which all are truly welcomed, liturgies in which diversities are acknowledged and accepted, and conversations about genetics which intentionally privilege disabled voices. These actions are solely in the domain of the Church, as neoliberal modernity and the scientific gaze hold virtually no space for such endeavors. Stahl makes her case convincingly. This work is an excellent resource for bioethicists and denominational leaders alike. The calls to action are clear and built on a firm foundation of theology and history. Although this book is certainly of use to congregants and ministers, perhaps it would land best among medical providers and those charged with crafting denominational policies. As Stahl shows, much work must be done at every level to create the possibility of a Church which can speak faithfully on genetic issues.","PeriodicalId":38120,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Disability and Religion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Disability and Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23312521.2023.2167147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

with evil, sin, or punishment (p. 103). Rather, “we need communal practices that allow us to sustain our faith” (p. 120). Christians must view one another through the imago Dei, allowing the creative capacity of God to surpass our imaginations (p. 131). Chapter 5 continues to unlink the Christian call to service from the teleological claim of a world with normalized bodies, freeing us to work toward ending suffering without following the claims of scientific domination. This leads to a significant challenge to the Church. Namely, “by welcoming and including all persons into their communities, Christian churches have the opportunity to declare something vital about the worth of human life” (p. 151). Refusing to engage at the deepest levels of metaphysics with science, as those from the Catholic tradition have, prevents the Protestant church from making claims rooted in its own ontology, and thus prevents disabled persons from experiencing the benefits of a world which sees their lives as gifts. Chapter 6 turns more deeply into natural law theology, contrasting Aquinas and Tillich to produce a “genethic” for the Church rooted in mirroring the creative justice, joy, and love which is already written into God’s creation (p. 169). The nuances here ultimately provide a link between human’s essential nature with their moral obligations, while naming the shifts necessary to connect Protestants to an otherwise typically Catholic doctrine. Chapters 7 and 8 deal with the concept and implication of all people being fundamentally gifts rather than as things to be controlled or manipulated. This requires the Church to produce spaces in which all are truly welcomed, liturgies in which diversities are acknowledged and accepted, and conversations about genetics which intentionally privilege disabled voices. These actions are solely in the domain of the Church, as neoliberal modernity and the scientific gaze hold virtually no space for such endeavors. Stahl makes her case convincingly. This work is an excellent resource for bioethicists and denominational leaders alike. The calls to action are clear and built on a firm foundation of theology and history. Although this book is certainly of use to congregants and ministers, perhaps it would land best among medical providers and those charged with crafting denominational policies. As Stahl shows, much work must be done at every level to create the possibility of a Church which can speak faithfully on genetic issues.
《在风暴中寻找耶稣:面临心理健康挑战的基督徒的属灵生活》
罪恶,罪恶,或惩罚(第103页)相反,“我们需要能够让我们维持信仰的公共实践”(第120页)。基督徒必须通过上帝的形象来看待彼此,让上帝的创造能力超越我们的想象(第131页)。第五章继续将基督教对服务的呼召与一个身体正常化的世界的目的论主张分开,使我们能够在不遵循科学统治主张的情况下努力结束痛苦。这给教会带来了重大挑战。也就是说,“基督教会欢迎并接纳所有人进入他们的团体,就有机会宣布关于人类生命价值的一些重要的东西”(第151页)。拒绝在形而上学的最深处与科学接触,就像那些来自天主教传统的人一样,阻止了新教教会在自己的本体论中提出主张,从而阻止了残疾人体验到一个把他们的生命视为礼物的世界的好处。第6章更深入地探讨了自然法神学,对比了阿奎那和蒂利希,为教会提出了一种根植于反映创造正义、欢乐和爱的“genethic”,这些已经写进了上帝的创造(第169页)。这里的细微差别最终提供了人类本质与道德义务之间的联系,同时指出了将新教徒与典型的天主教教义联系起来所必需的转变。第7章和第8章讨论了所有人本质上都是天赋的概念和含义,而不是被控制或操纵的东西。这要求教会创造真正欢迎所有人的空间,承认和接受多样性的礼拜仪式,以及有意优待残疾人声音的遗传学对话。这些行动完全属于教会的领域,因为新自由主义的现代性和科学的眼光实际上没有为这些努力提供空间。斯塔尔的观点令人信服。这项工作对生物伦理学家和教派领袖来说都是一个极好的资源。行动的呼吁是明确的,并建立在神学和历史的坚实基础上。虽然这本书对会众和牧师肯定有用,但也许它最适合医疗提供者和那些负责制定教派政策的人。正如斯塔尔所表明的那样,要创造一个能够忠实地谈论遗传问题的教会的可能性,必须在各个层面上做很多工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Disability and Religion
Journal of Disability and Religion Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信