{"title":"CURRENT APPROACHES IN THE SYSTEM LIGHTNING PROTECTION ARRANGEMENT OF BUILDINGS IN VIEW OF FIRE HAZARD AND PERSONAL RISK","authors":"Y. Rudyk, O. Nazarovets, I. Golovatchuk","doi":"10.32447/20786662.33.2018.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The complexity and power of a natural phenomenon with hazardous and dangerous properties, which is lightning, should be adequately evaluated and prevented at the most accessible organizational and technical level of a particular society. According to the principle of ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) applied in post-industrial countries, this risk, like others, should be reduced to the extent that is achievable. Neglecting to take a high risk of a hazardous event leads to excessive damage and large irreparable losses that a person or community cannot achieve sustainable development. Therefore, it is the complex, systematic approach in achieving safety, from the stage of assessment, to take into account both the characteristics of hazards, including fire in the relevant facilities, as well as personal, individual risk of death or injury. \nPurpose. Concerning to the situation with the systematic approach to technical regulation in Ukraine of such a safety sector as lightning protection, it is precisely this neglect that does not correspond to the current potential of the industrial, scientific, regulatory and social development levels. The purpose of this article is to analyze this problem in several areas. The state of technical regulation shows the priority of bringing normative documents into compliance with the legislation. \nMethods. Application of various methods of calculation, estimation, design and layout of the system allows realizing lightning protection system of buildings, equipment and people. To this aim, comparative characteristics of the passive and active lightning protection systems offered on the market are given; protective angle, rolling sphere, geometric methods of direct impact intercepting are compared. \nResults. Lightning is an unpredictable natural event; no one in the world is fully understand the mechanism of lightning, it is impossible for any standardization to provide 100% protection in all circumstances. In this view no liability shall attach to IEC and any other publications. Consideration of the implementation of the protection system grounded part is postponed with the condition of its full compliance with the selected components and the configuration of the system as a whole. System calculation of protection and assessment of the individual risk level is impossible without the internal elements and links in lightning protection system. A number of identified gaps in regulatory documents, the relationship between regulatory and supervisory bodies, users requests are suggested in the conclusions. The analysis of active normative and technical requirements to the lightning protection systems is conducted and the necessity of additional protective measures from the direct strike of lightning or voltage induction by a remote discharge by protective measures choice and charts of their setting is determined. On this basis the schemes of application of lightning protective systems from impulsive overvoltage are complemented, that substantially reduces the risk of fires and individual injures. \nConclusion. The statistics of death and injury from lightning hazardous factors, losses from property, buildings and structures damages confirms that in the risk assessment, which is standardized in DSTU EN 62305-2, it is necessary to introduce a methodology that complies with the conditions of Ukraine. Further application in the design of lightning protection systems of the national standard ДСТУ Б.В.2.5-38:2008 went beyond the technical regulation system of Ukraine. Arrangement of system lightning protection depends on: risk assessment, owner response, and influence of regulatory and supervisory bodies. Criteria for fire hazard of a facility require a more complete analysis by the supervise bodies and the owner, the methodology of which has not been implemented for today. The development of such criteria is carried out in the workgroup 1 of the Technical Committee 315, which involves the scientists of the LSULS.","PeriodicalId":12280,"journal":{"name":"Fire Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32447/20786662.33.2018.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Introduction. The complexity and power of a natural phenomenon with hazardous and dangerous properties, which is lightning, should be adequately evaluated and prevented at the most accessible organizational and technical level of a particular society. According to the principle of ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) applied in post-industrial countries, this risk, like others, should be reduced to the extent that is achievable. Neglecting to take a high risk of a hazardous event leads to excessive damage and large irreparable losses that a person or community cannot achieve sustainable development. Therefore, it is the complex, systematic approach in achieving safety, from the stage of assessment, to take into account both the characteristics of hazards, including fire in the relevant facilities, as well as personal, individual risk of death or injury.
Purpose. Concerning to the situation with the systematic approach to technical regulation in Ukraine of such a safety sector as lightning protection, it is precisely this neglect that does not correspond to the current potential of the industrial, scientific, regulatory and social development levels. The purpose of this article is to analyze this problem in several areas. The state of technical regulation shows the priority of bringing normative documents into compliance with the legislation.
Methods. Application of various methods of calculation, estimation, design and layout of the system allows realizing lightning protection system of buildings, equipment and people. To this aim, comparative characteristics of the passive and active lightning protection systems offered on the market are given; protective angle, rolling sphere, geometric methods of direct impact intercepting are compared.
Results. Lightning is an unpredictable natural event; no one in the world is fully understand the mechanism of lightning, it is impossible for any standardization to provide 100% protection in all circumstances. In this view no liability shall attach to IEC and any other publications. Consideration of the implementation of the protection system grounded part is postponed with the condition of its full compliance with the selected components and the configuration of the system as a whole. System calculation of protection and assessment of the individual risk level is impossible without the internal elements and links in lightning protection system. A number of identified gaps in regulatory documents, the relationship between regulatory and supervisory bodies, users requests are suggested in the conclusions. The analysis of active normative and technical requirements to the lightning protection systems is conducted and the necessity of additional protective measures from the direct strike of lightning or voltage induction by a remote discharge by protective measures choice and charts of their setting is determined. On this basis the schemes of application of lightning protective systems from impulsive overvoltage are complemented, that substantially reduces the risk of fires and individual injures.
Conclusion. The statistics of death and injury from lightning hazardous factors, losses from property, buildings and structures damages confirms that in the risk assessment, which is standardized in DSTU EN 62305-2, it is necessary to introduce a methodology that complies with the conditions of Ukraine. Further application in the design of lightning protection systems of the national standard ДСТУ Б.В.2.5-38:2008 went beyond the technical regulation system of Ukraine. Arrangement of system lightning protection depends on: risk assessment, owner response, and influence of regulatory and supervisory bodies. Criteria for fire hazard of a facility require a more complete analysis by the supervise bodies and the owner, the methodology of which has not been implemented for today. The development of such criteria is carried out in the workgroup 1 of the Technical Committee 315, which involves the scientists of the LSULS.
介绍。具有危险和危险性质的自然现象,即闪电,其复杂性和威力应该在一个特定社会最容易获得的组织和技术层面上得到充分评估和预防。根据适用于后工业国家的最低限额(尽可能低)原则,这一风险同其他风险一样,应降低到可以达到的程度。忽视对危险事件的高风险承担会导致过度损害和巨大的无法弥补的损失,使个人或社区无法实现可持续发展。因此,从评估阶段开始,既要考虑到危险的特征,包括有关设施的火灾,也要考虑到个人死亡或受伤的风险,这是实现安全的复杂、系统的方法。目的。关于乌克兰对防雷等安全部门的技术管制采取系统办法的情况,正是这种忽视不符合目前工业、科学、管制和社会发展水平的潜力。本文的目的是在几个方面分析这个问题。技术法规状态表现出使规范性文件符合立法的优先性。方法。应用各种方法对系统进行计算、估算、设计和布置,实现对建筑物、设备和人员的防雷系统保护。为此,给出了市场上提供的被动和主动防雷系统的比较特性;比较了保护角、滚动球、直接冲击拦截的几何方法。结果。闪电是一种不可预测的自然事件;世界上没有人完全了解闪电的机制,任何一种标准化都不可能在所有情况下提供100%的保护。据此,IEC和任何其他出版物不承担任何责任。在保护系统接地部分完全符合所选部件和系统整体配置的条件下,推迟考虑保护系统接地部分的实施。系统的防护计算和个体风险等级的评估离不开防雷系统的内部要素和环节。在结论中提出了监管文件、监管机构与监管机构之间的关系、用户要求等方面的一些已确定的差距。对防雷系统的现行规范和技术要求进行了分析,确定了通过保护措施的选择和设置图表,对雷电直接击雷或远程放电的电压感应采取额外保护措施的必要性。在此基础上,补充了脉冲过电压防雷系统的应用方案,大大降低了火灾和人身伤害的风险。结论。雷电危险因素造成的死亡和伤害、财产损失、建筑物和结构损坏的统计数据证实,在DSTU EN 62305-2标准化的风险评估中,有必要采用符合乌克兰条件的方法。国家标准ДСТУ Б.В.2.5-38:2008在防雷系统设计中的进一步应用超出了乌克兰技术法规体系。系统防雷的安排取决于:风险评估、业主反应和监管机构的影响。设施的火灾危险标准需要监督机构和业主进行更全面的分析,其方法目前尚未实施。这类标准的制定工作由315技术委员会第1工作组负责,该工作组有LSULS的科学家参与。