T. Nevalainen, Tanja Säily, Turo Vartiainen, A. Liimatta, Jefrey Lijffijt
{"title":"History of English as punctuated equilibria? A meta-analysis of the rate of linguistic change in Middle English","authors":"T. Nevalainen, Tanja Säily, Turo Vartiainen, A. Liimatta, Jefrey Lijffijt","doi":"10.1515/JHSL-2019-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this paper, we explore the rate of language change in the history of English. Our main focus is on detecting periods of accelerated change in Middle English (1150–1500), but we also compare the Middle English data with the Early Modern period (1500–1700) in order to establish a longer diachrony for the pace at which English has changed over time. Our study is based on a meta-analysis of existing corpus research, which is made available through a new linguistic resource, the Language Change Database (LCD). By aggregating the rates of 44 individual changes, we provide a critical assessment of how well the theory of punctuated equilibria (Dixon, Robert M. W. 1997. The rise and fall of languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) fits with our results. More specifically, by comparing the rate of language change with major language-external events, such as the Norman Conquest and the Black Death, we provide the first corpus-based meta-analysis of whether these events, which had significant societal consequences, also had an impact on the rate of language change. Our results indicate that major changes in the rate of linguistic change in the late medieval period could indeed be connected to the social and cultural after-effects of the Norman Conquest. We also make a methodological contribution to the field of English historical linguistics: by re-using data from existing research, linguists can start to ask new, fundamental questions about the ways in which language change progresses.","PeriodicalId":29883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/JHSL-2019-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Abstract In this paper, we explore the rate of language change in the history of English. Our main focus is on detecting periods of accelerated change in Middle English (1150–1500), but we also compare the Middle English data with the Early Modern period (1500–1700) in order to establish a longer diachrony for the pace at which English has changed over time. Our study is based on a meta-analysis of existing corpus research, which is made available through a new linguistic resource, the Language Change Database (LCD). By aggregating the rates of 44 individual changes, we provide a critical assessment of how well the theory of punctuated equilibria (Dixon, Robert M. W. 1997. The rise and fall of languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) fits with our results. More specifically, by comparing the rate of language change with major language-external events, such as the Norman Conquest and the Black Death, we provide the first corpus-based meta-analysis of whether these events, which had significant societal consequences, also had an impact on the rate of language change. Our results indicate that major changes in the rate of linguistic change in the late medieval period could indeed be connected to the social and cultural after-effects of the Norman Conquest. We also make a methodological contribution to the field of English historical linguistics: by re-using data from existing research, linguists can start to ask new, fundamental questions about the ways in which language change progresses.
本文探讨了英语历史上语言的变化速度。我们的主要重点是发现中世纪英语(1150-1500)加速变化的时期,但我们也将中世纪英语的数据与早期现代时期(1500-1700)进行比较,以便建立一个更长的时间跨度,说明英语随时间变化的速度。我们的研究是基于对现有语料库研究的荟萃分析,这些研究可以通过一个新的语言资源——语言变化数据库(LCD)获得。通过汇总44个个体变化的速率,我们对间断均衡理论的有效性进行了批判性评估(Dixon, Robert M. W. 1997)。语言的兴衰。剑桥:剑桥大学出版社)符合我们的研究结果。更具体地说,通过将语言变化率与主要的语言外部事件(如诺曼征服和黑死病)进行比较,我们提供了第一个基于语料库的元分析,以确定这些具有重大社会后果的事件是否也对语言变化率产生了影响。我们的研究结果表明,中世纪晚期语言变化速度的重大变化确实可能与诺曼征服的社会和文化后遗症有关。我们还为英语历史语言学领域做出了方法论上的贡献:通过重新使用现有研究的数据,语言学家可以开始提出关于语言变化进展方式的新的基本问题。