National Tax System: A Jurisprudential Discussion

Andrey Pacheco Santana, A. Nascimento, Débora Cristina Passos de Sá
{"title":"National Tax System: A Jurisprudential Discussion","authors":"Andrey Pacheco Santana, A. Nascimento, Débora Cristina Passos de Sá","doi":"10.22161/ijaers.102.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The municipalities, in search of a tax collection headquarters in order to bring more resources to their coffers so that they can carry out their public policies in a satisfactory manner, have been issuing, through secondary normative acts, via Decrees, significant changes in the tax calculation bases that are within its competence. The objective of the study was to respond to a jurisprudential discussion already consolidated by the Superior Courts regarding compliance with art. 150, I of the Federal Constitution of 1988, combined with art. 33 and art. 97, § 2 of the National Tax Code. The methodology of the study was a literature review, themethod adopted was the use of qualitative analysis techniques of the text, which occurs with the confrontation of information and analysis of speeches and contents about the tax system of its importance. The results showed that in the Constitution, especially with regard to the principle of legality, as a limitation of the State's power to tax, as this fact is an individual right of the taxpayer, not subject to suppression, protected by an immutable clause, as provided in article 60, § 4 of CF/88. It is concluded thatAuthorization for monetary restatement purposes is limited to the official indices provided for in the fiscal list or in the value plan contained in a Law approved by the Legislative or equivalent to the law, such as the use of a Provisional Measure.","PeriodicalId":13758,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22161/ijaers.102.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The municipalities, in search of a tax collection headquarters in order to bring more resources to their coffers so that they can carry out their public policies in a satisfactory manner, have been issuing, through secondary normative acts, via Decrees, significant changes in the tax calculation bases that are within its competence. The objective of the study was to respond to a jurisprudential discussion already consolidated by the Superior Courts regarding compliance with art. 150, I of the Federal Constitution of 1988, combined with art. 33 and art. 97, § 2 of the National Tax Code. The methodology of the study was a literature review, themethod adopted was the use of qualitative analysis techniques of the text, which occurs with the confrontation of information and analysis of speeches and contents about the tax system of its importance. The results showed that in the Constitution, especially with regard to the principle of legality, as a limitation of the State's power to tax, as this fact is an individual right of the taxpayer, not subject to suppression, protected by an immutable clause, as provided in article 60, § 4 of CF/88. It is concluded thatAuthorization for monetary restatement purposes is limited to the official indices provided for in the fiscal list or in the value plan contained in a Law approved by the Legislative or equivalent to the law, such as the use of a Provisional Measure.
国家税收制度:法理探讨
市政当局正在寻找一个税收总部,以便为它们的金库带来更多的资源,使它们能够以令人满意的方式执行它们的公共政策,它们已经通过二级规范性法令,通过法令,对其职权范围内的税收计算基础作出重大改变。这项研究的目的是回应高等法院已经巩固的关于遵守art的法理讨论。1988年联邦宪法第150条第1款,结合艺术。33和艺术。《国家税法》第97条第2款。本研究的方法论是文献综述法,所采用的方法是运用定性分析的方法对文本进行分析,对所发生的信息进行对抗,分析演讲和内容对税收制度的重要性。结果表明,在宪法中,特别是关于合法性原则,作为对国家征税权力的限制,因为这一事实是纳税人的个人权利,不受压制,受到不可改变的条款的保护,如CF/88第60条第4节所规定的那样。结论是,以货币重述为目的的授权仅限于财政清单中规定的官方指标,或立法机关批准的法律或相当于法律的法律所载的价值计划中规定的官方指标,例如使用临时措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信