La noción positiva de ciencia de Paul Karl Feyerabend

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
M. T. Vázquez
{"title":"La noción positiva de ciencia de Paul Karl Feyerabend","authors":"M. T. Vázquez","doi":"10.22201/IIFS.18704905E.2015.416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolEl pensamiento de Feyerabend ha sido objeto de multiples y divergentes interpretaciones, entre las que parece ser unanime la inscripcion de su obra dentro de las coordenadas de un escepticismo radical. Estas lecturas encuentran parcialmente sustento en su anarquismo epistemologico, el cual constituye en si mismo una reduccion al absurdo de los intentos del positivismo logico y del racionalismo critico de definir axiomatica o metodologicamente la ciencia. En este sentido, su obra puede ser entendida, en parte, como una argumentacion negativa y esceptica con respecto a aquellas nociones de ciencia. No obstante, esta hermeneutica no deja de ofrecer una vision fragmentaria y parcial de su pensamiento. El proposito de este articulo es reconstruir el itinerario intelectual a partir del cual Feyerabend va madurando su comprension positiva de la ciencia para trascender las hermeneuticas de su obra en la clave del escepticismo. EnglishFeyerabend´s thought has been the object of multiple and divergent interpretations, but amongst these the inscription of his work within the coordinates of a radical skepticism seems to be unanimous. These readings find partial support in his epistemological anarchism, which constitutes a reductio ad absurdum of the attempts of logical positivism and critical rationalism to define science axiomatically or methodologically; in this sense his work can be treated as a set of negative and skeptical arguments concerning those notions of science. However, this hermeneutic offers only a fragmented and partial view of his thought. The purpose of this article is to reconstruct the intellectual journey along which Feyerabend matures his positive understanding of science in order to transcend the hermeneutics of his work in the key of skepticism.","PeriodicalId":43820,"journal":{"name":"CRITICA-REVISTA HISPANOAMERICANA DE FILOSOFIA","volume":"239 1","pages":"61-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CRITICA-REVISTA HISPANOAMERICANA DE FILOSOFIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22201/IIFS.18704905E.2015.416","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

espanolEl pensamiento de Feyerabend ha sido objeto de multiples y divergentes interpretaciones, entre las que parece ser unanime la inscripcion de su obra dentro de las coordenadas de un escepticismo radical. Estas lecturas encuentran parcialmente sustento en su anarquismo epistemologico, el cual constituye en si mismo una reduccion al absurdo de los intentos del positivismo logico y del racionalismo critico de definir axiomatica o metodologicamente la ciencia. En este sentido, su obra puede ser entendida, en parte, como una argumentacion negativa y esceptica con respecto a aquellas nociones de ciencia. No obstante, esta hermeneutica no deja de ofrecer una vision fragmentaria y parcial de su pensamiento. El proposito de este articulo es reconstruir el itinerario intelectual a partir del cual Feyerabend va madurando su comprension positiva de la ciencia para trascender las hermeneuticas de su obra en la clave del escepticismo. EnglishFeyerabend´s thought has been the object of multiple and divergent interpretations, but amongst these the inscription of his work within the coordinates of a radical skepticism seems to be unanimous. These readings find partial support in his epistemological anarchism, which constitutes a reductio ad absurdum of the attempts of logical positivism and critical rationalism to define science axiomatically or methodologically; in this sense his work can be treated as a set of negative and skeptical arguments concerning those notions of science. However, this hermeneutic offers only a fragmented and partial view of his thought. The purpose of this article is to reconstruct the intellectual journey along which Feyerabend matures his positive understanding of science in order to transcend the hermeneutics of his work in the key of skepticism.
保罗·卡尔·费耶阿本德的实证科学概念
费耶阿本德的西班牙思想一直是多种不同解释的对象,其中似乎一致将他的作品置于激进怀疑主义的协调之下。这些解读在一定程度上得到了他的认识论无政府主义的支持,这本身就构成了对逻辑实证主义和批判理性主义试图用公理或方法论来定义科学的荒谬的还原。从这个意义上说,他的工作在一定程度上可以被理解为对这些科学概念的否定和怀疑的论证。然而,这种解释学并没有停止对他的思想的零碎和片面的看法。费耶阿本德对科学的积极理解已经成熟,并在怀疑主义的关键中超越了他的工作的解释学。EnglishFeyerabend´s thought has been the object of multiple and divergent,这些之间的but the inscription第五十七条访问within the coordinates of a radical skepticism人似乎都在unanimous。这些读物在其认识论无政府主义中找到了部分支持,它构成了对逻辑实证主义和批判理性主义的尝试的一种还原与谬论,以公理或方法定义科学;in this sense的work can be对as a set of消极and都会提出关于这些notions of science。= =地理= =根据美国人口普查,这个县的面积为。本说明的目的是条is to reconstruct The intellectual journey unitde which Feyerabend matures其积极understanding of science in order to transcend The hermeneutics其work in The key of skepticism。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信