A systematic comparison of 3 phrase sampling methods for text entry experiments in 10 languages

Germán Sanchis-Trilles, Luis A. Leiva
{"title":"A systematic comparison of 3 phrase sampling methods for text entry experiments in 10 languages","authors":"Germán Sanchis-Trilles, Luis A. Leiva","doi":"10.1145/2628363.2634229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Today's reference datasets for conducting text entry experiments are only available in English, which may lead to misleading results when testing text entry methods with non-native English speakers. We compared 3 automated phrase sampling methods available in the literature: Random, Ngram, and MemRep. It was found that MemRep performs best according to a statistical analysis and qualitative observations. This resulted in a collection of 30 datasets across 10 major languages, and we wish to share them with the community via this paper.","PeriodicalId":74207,"journal":{"name":"MobileHCI : proceedings of the ... International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. MobileHCI (Conference)","volume":"31 1","pages":"537-542"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MobileHCI : proceedings of the ... International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. MobileHCI (Conference)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2628363.2634229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Today's reference datasets for conducting text entry experiments are only available in English, which may lead to misleading results when testing text entry methods with non-native English speakers. We compared 3 automated phrase sampling methods available in the literature: Random, Ngram, and MemRep. It was found that MemRep performs best according to a statistical analysis and qualitative observations. This resulted in a collection of 30 datasets across 10 major languages, and we wish to share them with the community via this paper.
10种语言文本录入实验中3种短语采样方法的系统比较
目前用于进行文本输入实验的参考数据集只有英文版本,这可能会导致在对非英语母语人士进行文本输入方法测试时产生误导性结果。我们比较了文献中可用的3种自动短语采样方法:Random、Ngram和MemRep。通过统计分析和定性观察,发现MemRep效果最好。这导致了10种主要语言的30个数据集的收集,我们希望通过本文与社区分享。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信