Joseph Kessels, D. L. Foster, W.A.J. Bleuanus
求助PDF
{"title":"Fuel penalty comparison for (electrically) heated catalyst technology = Comparaison de l’augmentation de consommation de carburant pour la technologie de catalyseurs chauffés à l’électricité","authors":"Joseph Kessels, D. L. Foster, W.A.J. Bleuanus","doi":"10.2516/OGST/2009078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The conversion efficiency of three way catalytic converters is mainly defined by the temperature range wherein they are operating. Traditionally, ignition retard has been used to reduce the light-off time of the catalyst. This is however associated with a fuel penalty. With increasing vehicle electrification, electrically heating facilities present an alternative, especially for hybrid vehicles. Nevertheless, system complexity of hybrid vehicles prevents engineers to evaluate possible heating technologies and their corresponding fuel penalty with respect to traditional solutions. This paper evaluates the application of an electrically heated catalyst on a hybrid vehicle equipped with a Natural Gas (NG) engine. The effect of heating power on light-off time and fuel penalty is determined, using analysis techniques emerging from integrated powertrain control. By means of a case study, the importance of an integral approach is explained by comparing the fuel penalty and conversion efficiency improvement of electric heating with that of ignition retard. In this process, a mix of simulation and test data were combined, forming the foundations for future control developments of a suitable light-off strategy. © 2010 Institut francais du petrole.","PeriodicalId":19444,"journal":{"name":"Oil & Gas Science and Technology-revue De L Institut Francais Du Petrole","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oil & Gas Science and Technology-revue De L Institut Francais Du Petrole","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2516/OGST/2009078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17
引用
批量引用
(电)加热催化剂技术的燃料惩罚比较=电加热催化剂技术增加燃料消耗的比较
三元催化转化器的转化效率主要取决于其工作的温度范围。传统上采用阻燃剂来缩短催化剂的点火时间。然而,这与燃料惩罚有关。随着汽车电气化程度的提高,电加热设备提供了一种替代方案,特别是对于混合动力汽车。然而,混合动力汽车系统的复杂性使工程师无法评估可能的加热技术及其与传统解决方案相对应的燃油损失。本文评价了电加热催化剂在天然气发动机混合动力汽车上的应用。利用集成动力系统控制的分析技术,确定了加热功率对点火时间和燃油惩罚的影响。通过实例分析,比较了电加热与延迟点火的燃油损失和转换效率的提高,说明了一体化方法的重要性。在此过程中,将模拟和测试数据相结合,为未来合适的点火策略的控制发展奠定了基础。©2010法国石油研究所。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。