{"title":"Creative metaphors and non-propositional effects","authors":"V. Bardzokas","doi":"10.1075/prag.22034.bar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Over the last decade there has been growing relevance-theoretic interest in the interpretation of creative\n metaphors. Much of this interest has focused on non-propositional aspects of interpretation: mental image effects/emotive effects.\n Central to this enquiry is the following question: are non-propositional effects essential to the metaphorical interpretation\n process? The implications of answering this question are important, since, if the answer is positive, then the delivery of\n metaphorical interpretation depends, not only on utterance processing, but also on the hearer’s formation of mental images as well\n as emotive experience. Relevance-theoretic studies argue that mental images do not fulfill an essential role in the metaphorical\n interpretation process. While the supporting evidence is solid, it requires experimental substantiation. The current paper\n responds to this requirement, taking on board emotive effects, too, apart from mental images. Ultimately, the current work\n concludes that the role of non-propositional effects in metaphorical interpretation is not essential.","PeriodicalId":46975,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatics","volume":"144 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.22034.bar","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Over the last decade there has been growing relevance-theoretic interest in the interpretation of creative
metaphors. Much of this interest has focused on non-propositional aspects of interpretation: mental image effects/emotive effects.
Central to this enquiry is the following question: are non-propositional effects essential to the metaphorical interpretation
process? The implications of answering this question are important, since, if the answer is positive, then the delivery of
metaphorical interpretation depends, not only on utterance processing, but also on the hearer’s formation of mental images as well
as emotive experience. Relevance-theoretic studies argue that mental images do not fulfill an essential role in the metaphorical
interpretation process. While the supporting evidence is solid, it requires experimental substantiation. The current paper
responds to this requirement, taking on board emotive effects, too, apart from mental images. Ultimately, the current work
concludes that the role of non-propositional effects in metaphorical interpretation is not essential.