Creative metaphors and non-propositional effects

IF 1.1 2区 文学 N/A LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Pragmatics Pub Date : 2023-08-17 DOI:10.1075/prag.22034.bar
V. Bardzokas
{"title":"Creative metaphors and non-propositional effects","authors":"V. Bardzokas","doi":"10.1075/prag.22034.bar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Over the last decade there has been growing relevance-theoretic interest in the interpretation of creative\n metaphors. Much of this interest has focused on non-propositional aspects of interpretation: mental image effects/emotive effects.\n Central to this enquiry is the following question: are non-propositional effects essential to the metaphorical interpretation\n process? The implications of answering this question are important, since, if the answer is positive, then the delivery of\n metaphorical interpretation depends, not only on utterance processing, but also on the hearer’s formation of mental images as well\n as emotive experience. Relevance-theoretic studies argue that mental images do not fulfill an essential role in the metaphorical\n interpretation process. While the supporting evidence is solid, it requires experimental substantiation. The current paper\n responds to this requirement, taking on board emotive effects, too, apart from mental images. Ultimately, the current work\n concludes that the role of non-propositional effects in metaphorical interpretation is not essential.","PeriodicalId":46975,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.22034.bar","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the last decade there has been growing relevance-theoretic interest in the interpretation of creative metaphors. Much of this interest has focused on non-propositional aspects of interpretation: mental image effects/emotive effects. Central to this enquiry is the following question: are non-propositional effects essential to the metaphorical interpretation process? The implications of answering this question are important, since, if the answer is positive, then the delivery of metaphorical interpretation depends, not only on utterance processing, but also on the hearer’s formation of mental images as well as emotive experience. Relevance-theoretic studies argue that mental images do not fulfill an essential role in the metaphorical interpretation process. While the supporting evidence is solid, it requires experimental substantiation. The current paper responds to this requirement, taking on board emotive effects, too, apart from mental images. Ultimately, the current work concludes that the role of non-propositional effects in metaphorical interpretation is not essential.
创造性隐喻和非命题效果
在过去的十年里,对创造性隐喻的解释产生了越来越多的关联理论兴趣。这种兴趣主要集中在解释的非命题方面:心理意象效应/情感效应。这个研究的核心是以下问题:非命题效应对隐喻解释过程至关重要吗?回答这个问题的含义很重要,因为如果答案是肯定的,那么隐喻解释的传递不仅取决于话语处理,还取决于听者心理图像的形成以及情感体验。关联理论研究认为,心理意象在隐喻解释过程中并不起重要作用。虽然支持证据是确凿的,但它需要实验证实。目前的论文回应了这一要求,除了心理图像之外,还考虑了情感影响。最后,本研究得出结论,非命题效应在隐喻解释中的作用并不重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pragmatics
Pragmatics Multiple-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
186
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信