Group Creative Problem Solving: The Role of Creative Personality, Process and Creative Ability

IF 1.8 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Gerald F. Burch, Jana J. Burch, John H. Batchelor
{"title":"Group Creative Problem Solving: The Role of Creative Personality, Process and Creative Ability","authors":"Gerald F. Burch, Jana J. Burch, John H. Batchelor","doi":"10.12776/qip.v23i3.1286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Team creativity is an important factor in developing new ideas for organisations. In spite of years of creativity research, little is known about various team aspects and their affect on team creativity. This study looks at the incremental explanatory value that team creative personality and divergent thinking skill processes have on team creativity. Methodology/Approach: Individual personality, creative personality, and divergent thinking skills were collected from 349 students at a large public university in the southeast US. These students were then randomly assigned to 105 teams where they developed a novel product. Individual attributes were averaged to create team attributes that were used to determine correlations with the product creativity. Hierarchical regression was used to evaluate incremental explanatory values for each of the independent variables. Findings: Group creative personality adds approximately 36 percent more explanatory power than cognitive ability and traditional personality measures in predicting team creativity. Creative processes, like team divergent thinking ability, further increased the R 2 of our model from 0.54 to 0.65 demonstrating that team processes affect team creativity. Research Limitation/implication: The task used in this study was not as complex as problems being considered by organizations. However, the results are expected to be indicative of the process used for more complex problems. It is also difficult to assign causality since correlations were used to verify some of our hypothesis. Originality/Value of paper: This research expands the findings of team creativity by identifying factors that increase team creativity.","PeriodicalId":44057,"journal":{"name":"Quality Innovation Prosperity-Kvalita Inovacia Prosperita","volume":"2 1","pages":"38-54"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality Innovation Prosperity-Kvalita Inovacia Prosperita","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v23i3.1286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Purpose: Team creativity is an important factor in developing new ideas for organisations. In spite of years of creativity research, little is known about various team aspects and their affect on team creativity. This study looks at the incremental explanatory value that team creative personality and divergent thinking skill processes have on team creativity. Methodology/Approach: Individual personality, creative personality, and divergent thinking skills were collected from 349 students at a large public university in the southeast US. These students were then randomly assigned to 105 teams where they developed a novel product. Individual attributes were averaged to create team attributes that were used to determine correlations with the product creativity. Hierarchical regression was used to evaluate incremental explanatory values for each of the independent variables. Findings: Group creative personality adds approximately 36 percent more explanatory power than cognitive ability and traditional personality measures in predicting team creativity. Creative processes, like team divergent thinking ability, further increased the R 2 of our model from 0.54 to 0.65 demonstrating that team processes affect team creativity. Research Limitation/implication: The task used in this study was not as complex as problems being considered by organizations. However, the results are expected to be indicative of the process used for more complex problems. It is also difficult to assign causality since correlations were used to verify some of our hypothesis. Originality/Value of paper: This research expands the findings of team creativity by identifying factors that increase team creativity.
群体创造性解决问题:创造性人格、创造性过程和创造性能力的作用
目的:团队创造力是组织发展新想法的重要因素。尽管多年来对创造力的研究,但人们对团队的各个方面及其对团队创造力的影响知之甚少。本研究探讨了团队创造性人格和发散性思维技能过程对团队创造力的增量解释价值。方法/方法:从美国东南部一所大型公立大学的349名学生中收集了个人性格、创造性性格和发散性思维技能。然后这些学生被随机分配到105个小组,在那里他们开发一种新产品。对个人属性进行平均,以创建用于确定与产品创造力的相关性的团队属性。层次回归用于评估每个自变量的增量解释值。研究发现:在预测团队创造力方面,团队创造性人格比认知能力和传统的人格标准增加了大约36%的解释力。创新过程,如团队发散思维能力,进一步将我们模型的r2从0.54提高到0.65,表明团队过程影响团队创造力。研究限制/启示:本研究中使用的任务并不像组织所考虑的问题那么复杂。然而,这些结果有望为解决更复杂的问题提供参考。也很难分配因果关系,因为相关性被用来验证我们的一些假设。原创性/论文价值:本研究通过识别提高团队创造力的因素,扩展了团队创造力的研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
16
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信