“Me and Socrates, we are tight friends”: Co-constructing a polis of teachers and philosophers of education.

Cara E. Furman
{"title":"“Me and Socrates, we are tight friends”: Co-constructing a polis of teachers and philosophers of education.","authors":"Cara E. Furman","doi":"10.46786/AC21.8287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is an educational truism that reflection helps teachers to be more effective and ethical. Building on John Dewey’s assertion that we learn by doing and reflecting, and Hannah Arendt’s that reflection is strengthened through discourse among peers, I argue that a valuable role for teacher educators is to be interlocutors with whom teachers can reflect. Adding to previous scholarship that positions philosophers of education as ideal interlocutors, I focus on the nature of the relationship between teachers and philosophers of education. Mirroring the format of the Socratic dialogues, I include three dialogues to explore how teachers and philosophers of education might reflect together. The first dialogue is the transcription of an interview about reflection and teaching between a former elementary school teacher colleague and me (then a doctoral student in philosophy of education). The second is a written dialogue that brings the interview into communication with Plato and Arendt to further elucidate what it means to reflect as a teacher and with teachers. The third dialogue occurred many years later as a group of philosophers of education reflected upon dialogues 1 and 2 to consider how they might better engage with teachers.","PeriodicalId":7023,"journal":{"name":"ACCESS: Contemporary Issues in Education","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACCESS: Contemporary Issues in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46786/AC21.8287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is an educational truism that reflection helps teachers to be more effective and ethical. Building on John Dewey’s assertion that we learn by doing and reflecting, and Hannah Arendt’s that reflection is strengthened through discourse among peers, I argue that a valuable role for teacher educators is to be interlocutors with whom teachers can reflect. Adding to previous scholarship that positions philosophers of education as ideal interlocutors, I focus on the nature of the relationship between teachers and philosophers of education. Mirroring the format of the Socratic dialogues, I include three dialogues to explore how teachers and philosophers of education might reflect together. The first dialogue is the transcription of an interview about reflection and teaching between a former elementary school teacher colleague and me (then a doctoral student in philosophy of education). The second is a written dialogue that brings the interview into communication with Plato and Arendt to further elucidate what it means to reflect as a teacher and with teachers. The third dialogue occurred many years later as a group of philosophers of education reflected upon dialogues 1 and 2 to consider how they might better engage with teachers.
“我和苏格拉底,我们是亲密的朋友”:共同构建一个教师和教育哲学家的城邦。
反思有助于教师更有效、更有道德,这是教育界的真理。基于约翰·杜威(John Dewey)的主张,即我们通过实践和反思来学习,以及汉娜·阿伦特(Hannah Arendt)的主张,即反思通过同龄人之间的话语得到加强,我认为教师教育者的一个有价值的角色是成为教师可以反思的对话者。除了之前将教育哲学家定位为理想对话者的学术研究之外,我还将重点放在教师与教育哲学家之间关系的本质上。与苏格拉底对话的形式相呼应,我包括三个对话来探讨教师和教育哲学家如何共同反思。第一个对话是我和一位前小学教师同事(当时是教育哲学博士生)之间关于反思和教学的采访记录。第二部分是书面对话,将访谈带入与柏拉图和阿伦特的交流中,以进一步阐明作为教师和与教师进行反思的意义。第三次对话发生在许多年后,当时一群教育哲学家反思对话1和2,考虑如何更好地与教师互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信