Path dependency and partisan interests: explaining COVID-19 social support programmes in East-Central Europe

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES
Alen Toplišek, Nils Oellerich, J. P. Simons, Edgars Eihmanis
{"title":"Path dependency and partisan interests: explaining COVID-19 social support programmes in East-Central Europe","authors":"Alen Toplišek, Nils Oellerich, J. P. Simons, Edgars Eihmanis","doi":"10.1080/21599165.2022.2122046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT What factors influence governments' social policy responses to the COVID-19 crisis in East-Central Europe? We attempt to answer this question by analysing the social policy responses to the pandemic across three distinct institutional varieties and welfare states: Estonia, Slovakia, and Slovenia. Drawing on extensive analysis of qualitative and quantitative data, we argue that the constraints on government agency posed by previous, posttransition patterns of social policymaking and their underlying core institutional legacies have a distinct influence on governments' distributive choices. Governments' partisan interests are reflected in some of the enacted measures, albeit in less consolidated parts of welfare state structures.","PeriodicalId":46570,"journal":{"name":"East European Politics","volume":"40 1","pages":"641 - 661"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East European Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2022.2122046","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT What factors influence governments' social policy responses to the COVID-19 crisis in East-Central Europe? We attempt to answer this question by analysing the social policy responses to the pandemic across three distinct institutional varieties and welfare states: Estonia, Slovakia, and Slovenia. Drawing on extensive analysis of qualitative and quantitative data, we argue that the constraints on government agency posed by previous, posttransition patterns of social policymaking and their underlying core institutional legacies have a distinct influence on governments' distributive choices. Governments' partisan interests are reflected in some of the enacted measures, albeit in less consolidated parts of welfare state structures.
路径依赖和党派利益:解释中东欧COVID-19社会支持规划
哪些因素影响中东欧国家政府应对COVID-19危机的社会政策?我们试图通过分析爱沙尼亚、斯洛伐克和斯洛文尼亚这三个不同制度和福利国家对疫情的社会政策反应来回答这个问题。通过对定性和定量数据的广泛分析,我们认为,转型前和转型后的社会政策制定模式及其潜在的核心制度遗产对政府机构的约束对政府的分配选择有明显的影响。政府的党派利益反映在一些已颁布的措施中,尽管是在福利国家结构中不那么稳固的部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
East European Politics
East European Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
9.40%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信