Effect of Thickness on Translucency and Masking Ability of a Effect of Thickness on Translucency and Masking Ability of a Recently Developed Single-Shade Resin Composite with Recently Developed Single-Shade Resin Composite with Enhanced Opacity: An In Vitro Comparative Study
{"title":"Effect of Thickness on Translucency and Masking Ability of a Effect of Thickness on Translucency and Masking Ability of a Recently Developed Single-Shade Resin Composite with Recently Developed Single-Shade Resin Composite with Enhanced Opacity: An In Vitro Comparative Study","authors":"Sayed M. Ghorab, hagag atya","doi":"10.54623/fdj.70211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of thickness changes on translucency and masking ability of a recently developed single shade resin composite material with enhanced opacity comparing it with a traditional opaque-shade one. Material and methods: Two brands of composite resins; Omnichroma blocker (OCB) and G-aenial Anterior (GA) in opaque A2 (OA2) shade were selected to enroll the study. Color coordinates of each composite were determined at 0.5, 1, and 1.5mm thicknesses (n=10/thickness) on four different backgrounds (white baking, black baking, C4 shade porcelain baking and the backing of material itself) by using a spectrophotometer to determine the translucency parameter (TP) and masking ability of the study materials. Data were statistically analyzed using One-way ANOVA, T-test and Tukey HSD as a post hoc for multiple comparisons (P < .05). Results: TP and ΔE* values obtained between specimens on different backgrounds decreased as thickness increased. For both materials, a black backing was masked by thicknesses of 1.5 mm, whereas a C4 porcelain backing was masked by all resin thicknesses. Conclusion: In relatively thin thicknesses (≤1mm), both composites could not mask the black background color. On the other hand, they could mask C4 porcelain background color at all thicknesses","PeriodicalId":100562,"journal":{"name":"Future Dental Journal","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54623/fdj.70211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of thickness changes on translucency and masking ability of a recently developed single shade resin composite material with enhanced opacity comparing it with a traditional opaque-shade one. Material and methods: Two brands of composite resins; Omnichroma blocker (OCB) and G-aenial Anterior (GA) in opaque A2 (OA2) shade were selected to enroll the study. Color coordinates of each composite were determined at 0.5, 1, and 1.5mm thicknesses (n=10/thickness) on four different backgrounds (white baking, black baking, C4 shade porcelain baking and the backing of material itself) by using a spectrophotometer to determine the translucency parameter (TP) and masking ability of the study materials. Data were statistically analyzed using One-way ANOVA, T-test and Tukey HSD as a post hoc for multiple comparisons (P < .05). Results: TP and ΔE* values obtained between specimens on different backgrounds decreased as thickness increased. For both materials, a black backing was masked by thicknesses of 1.5 mm, whereas a C4 porcelain backing was masked by all resin thicknesses. Conclusion: In relatively thin thicknesses (≤1mm), both composites could not mask the black background color. On the other hand, they could mask C4 porcelain background color at all thicknesses