Conceptions of choice, equity, & rurality in educational research: A review of the literature on rural education and school choice policies
Q4 Social Sciences
James C. Bridgeforth, K. Kennedy, Jacob D. Alonso, Taylor Enoch-Stevens
{"title":"Conceptions of choice, equity, & rurality in educational research: A review of the literature on rural education and school choice policies","authors":"James C. Bridgeforth, K. Kennedy, Jacob D. Alonso, Taylor Enoch-Stevens","doi":"10.35608/RURALED.V42I2.1242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Issues of school choice regularly appear in popular discourse related to resources, equity, and freedom in education. Although school choice policies and initiatives promote a vision of additional schooling options for all students, the predominant target of choice advocates and researchers has been densely populated, urban cores in the United States (McShane & Smarick, 2018). However, this belies the fact that rural communities have also engaged in forms of school choice decision-making. While some research has explored rural school choice, we believe there are myriad, novel opportunities for meaningful education research regarding school choice, equity, and conceptions of rurality. Over nine million children in the United States, or nearly 20% of the public-school student population, attend a school designated as rural (Kena et al., 2015;Showalter et al., 2019). Additionally, rural schools and districts have remarkable levels of variability in terms of racial, ethnic, cultural, and geographic compositions. These contexts provide significant motivation for further explorations of rurality and school choice. This review is not intended to advocate for an expansion of school choice policies. Rather, we aim for it to serve as a call for additional research that seeks to better understand how school choice policies are currently operating in rural areas and their implications for educational equity. To advance toward a robust research agenda for rural education and school choice, we review the existing literature on school choice and rural education, provide key recommendations, and assert the need for additional consideration of the following: critical socio-political histories and theories;methodological diversity;issues of race, racism, sexual orientation, and equity;social-emotional learning and development;impacts of the COVID-19 global pandemic;and broadened understandings of rurality. © 2021.","PeriodicalId":33740,"journal":{"name":"The Rural Educator","volume":"73 1","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Rural Educator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35608/RURALED.V42I2.1242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Issues of school choice regularly appear in popular discourse related to resources, equity, and freedom in education. Although school choice policies and initiatives promote a vision of additional schooling options for all students, the predominant target of choice advocates and researchers has been densely populated, urban cores in the United States (McShane & Smarick, 2018). However, this belies the fact that rural communities have also engaged in forms of school choice decision-making. While some research has explored rural school choice, we believe there are myriad, novel opportunities for meaningful education research regarding school choice, equity, and conceptions of rurality. Over nine million children in the United States, or nearly 20% of the public-school student population, attend a school designated as rural (Kena et al., 2015;Showalter et al., 2019). Additionally, rural schools and districts have remarkable levels of variability in terms of racial, ethnic, cultural, and geographic compositions. These contexts provide significant motivation for further explorations of rurality and school choice. This review is not intended to advocate for an expansion of school choice policies. Rather, we aim for it to serve as a call for additional research that seeks to better understand how school choice policies are currently operating in rural areas and their implications for educational equity. To advance toward a robust research agenda for rural education and school choice, we review the existing literature on school choice and rural education, provide key recommendations, and assert the need for additional consideration of the following: critical socio-political histories and theories;methodological diversity;issues of race, racism, sexual orientation, and equity;social-emotional learning and development;impacts of the COVID-19 global pandemic;and broadened understandings of rurality. © 2021.
教育研究中的选择、公平与乡村观念:农村教育与择校政策文献综述
择校问题经常出现在与教育资源、公平和自由相关的大众话语中。尽管择校政策和举措促进了为所有学生提供额外学校选择的愿景,但择校倡导者和研究人员的主要目标是美国人口稠密的城市核心(McShane & Smarick, 2018)。然而,这掩盖了一个事实,即农村社区也参与了各种形式的择校决策。虽然一些研究已经探讨了农村择校问题,但我们相信,在择校、公平和农村概念方面,有无数的、有意义的教育研究的新机会。在美国,超过900万儿童,或近20%的公立学校学生,就读于被指定为农村的学校(Kena等人,2015;Showalter等人,2019)。此外,农村学校和地区在种族、民族、文化和地理构成方面存在显著差异。这些背景为进一步探索乡村性和学校选择提供了重要的动力。这篇评论并不是要提倡扩大择校政策。相反,我们的目标是呼吁进行更多的研究,以更好地了解学校选择政策目前在农村地区是如何运作的,以及它们对教育公平的影响。为了推进农村教育和学校选择的强有力的研究议程,我们回顾了关于学校选择和农村教育的现有文献,提供了关键建议,并断言需要额外考虑以下问题:重要的社会政治历史和理论;方法多样性;种族、种族主义、性取向和公平问题;社会情感学习和发展;2019冠状病毒病全球大流行的影响;以及对农村的更广泛理解。©2021。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。