Comparative Analysis of the Coronavirus Metaphorical Projections in the Chinese and Russian Mass Media

O. Kalinin, Alexander Romanov
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of the Coronavirus Metaphorical Projections in the Chinese and Russian Mass Media","authors":"O. Kalinin, Alexander Romanov","doi":"10.17516/1997-1370-0834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research focuses on a comparative analysis of the coronavirus metaphorical image in the Chinese and Russian mass media. The discursive theory of metaphor serves as a theoretical basis for our study. Within the framework of this theory metaphor is referred to as a cognitive frame, which operates in the discursive space for a certain period of time. J. Charteris-Black’s Metaphor Critical Analysis has been used for the practical part of this paper. Linguistic analysis is based upon headlines and leads of Chinese and Russian news reports on the coronavirus pandemic. A total of 750 units of analysis in Chinese and 1,000 units of analysis in Russian have been examined. The authors arrive at the conclusion that media projections of the coronavirus image in the PRC and Russia are similar. Among the most widespread metaphorical models are «Virus is Enemy/Antagonist,» «Virus is Natural Disaster/Phenomenon,» «Virus is Living Creature,» and «Virus is Cause of Fear.» Despite overall homogeneity of metaphorical images, quantitative indicators of the distribution of metaphors and metaphorical implications (entailments) show significant differences. Critical analysis of Chinese and Russian media metaphors has made it possible to scrutinize public opinion within two different political systems","PeriodicalId":37201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Siberian Federal University - Humanities and Social Sciences","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Siberian Federal University - Humanities and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17516/1997-1370-0834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This research focuses on a comparative analysis of the coronavirus metaphorical image in the Chinese and Russian mass media. The discursive theory of metaphor serves as a theoretical basis for our study. Within the framework of this theory metaphor is referred to as a cognitive frame, which operates in the discursive space for a certain period of time. J. Charteris-Black’s Metaphor Critical Analysis has been used for the practical part of this paper. Linguistic analysis is based upon headlines and leads of Chinese and Russian news reports on the coronavirus pandemic. A total of 750 units of analysis in Chinese and 1,000 units of analysis in Russian have been examined. The authors arrive at the conclusion that media projections of the coronavirus image in the PRC and Russia are similar. Among the most widespread metaphorical models are «Virus is Enemy/Antagonist,» «Virus is Natural Disaster/Phenomenon,» «Virus is Living Creature,» and «Virus is Cause of Fear.» Despite overall homogeneity of metaphorical images, quantitative indicators of the distribution of metaphors and metaphorical implications (entailments) show significant differences. Critical analysis of Chinese and Russian media metaphors has made it possible to scrutinize public opinion within two different political systems
中俄大众传媒对冠状病毒隐喻投射的比较分析
本研究的重点是对中俄大众媒体中冠状病毒的隐喻形象进行比较分析。隐喻的话语理论为我们的研究提供了理论基础。在这一理论的框架内,隐喻被称为认知框架,它在一定时间内在话语空间中运行。本文的实践部分采用了J. Charteris-Black的隐喻批判分析。语言分析基于中国和俄罗斯关于冠状病毒大流行的新闻报道的标题和线索。共检查了750个中文分析单元和1000个俄文分析单元。作者得出结论,中国和俄罗斯媒体对冠状病毒图像的预测是相似的。其中最广泛的隐喻模型是“病毒是敌人/拮抗剂”,“病毒是自然灾害/现象”,“病毒是生物”和“病毒是恐惧的原因”。尽管隐喻形象总体上具有同质性,但隐喻分布和隐喻含义(蕴涵)的定量指标显示出显著差异。对中国和俄罗斯媒体隐喻的批判性分析使得在两种不同的政治制度下审视公众舆论成为可能
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信