Emotional Intelligence and the Ethic of Care

Jim A. McCleskey
{"title":"Emotional Intelligence and the Ethic of Care","authors":"Jim A. McCleskey","doi":"10.9774/GLEAF.3709.2016.OC.00007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"THE ABILITY TO TEACH INDIVIDUALS in organizational and workplace settings to make ethical decisions has become a significant problem for 21st-century companies (Ferrell, Fraedrich, and Ferrell, 2015). Enron, WorldCom, the housing crisis, and Bernie Madoffhave become unwelcome additions to our daily lexicon. Increasing public outrage has been aimed at both the business community and the business of higher education following the barrage of highly publicized scandals since 2000. A recent National Business Ethics Survey reported that 45% of employees have observed at least one unethical act of workplace misconduct in their organization. It may be argued that ethics has reached the status of an organizational crisis. For perhaps the first time ever, organizations realize that they must be responsible for the ethical instruction of their employees, and they can no longer simply rely on hiring bright and capable people and hoping that they would behave ethically when the situation calls for it (Ferrell et al., 2015). However, this realization creates a problem in many organizations.The problem is the inherent difficulty associated with teaching correct ethical and moral behavior inside workplace and organizational settings. This article includes a review of that specific business problem in light of two unique but connected ideas. The first unique idea is the concept of viewing ethical decisionmaking through a specific framework, the Ethic of Care (E°C). The second unique idea is the concept that leader emotional intelligence (EI) relates to the ability to introduce the E°C as a framework for fostering and encouraging ethical behavior in organizations. In connection with the business problem and the unique ideas, three specific propositions are presented in this paper. In addition to these three propositions, the article includes a discussion of ethics in business, applying ethics, ethics and EI, and the E°C and EI. First, a brief review of the relevant literature is presented.Literature reviewEthics in businessVelasquez (2006) notes that business ethics is applied ethics and that it is the application or understanding of what is good and right to that group of institutions, technologies, transactions, activities, and various pursuits that we refer to as a business. Any discussion of business ethics, therefore, begins by providing a framework of basic principles for understanding what is meant by the terms good and right and only then can one proceed to discuss the various implications these practices have for our business world (Velasquez, 2006). Schlegelmilch (2010) discusses the evolution of applied ethics to specific business disciplines. He also identifies 18 different areas where ethical issues can affect a business environment. Although not all of these areas will be considered here, it may be beneficial to list all 18 areas in order to provide a full framework for the discussion of ethics and business. These areas include: product-related issues, price-related issues, distribution, the promotion of products or services, sales and sales people, codes and ethical norms, consumers and consumer protections, issues specifically related to vulnerable consumer populations, international or crosscultural issues, consumer research and privacy, consumer education, issues related to environmentally sound or green initiatives, social marketing or social media, law or law enforcement, internet-related issues, religious issues, and the review of scholarly literature (Schlegelmilch, 2010). While writing a literature review for a specific business discipline, Schlegelmilch's work highlights the continuum of ethical issues in business over a period from the 1960s to 2000s. Other authors also addressed the issues of ethics in business.Ferrell and Gresham (1985) described the challenge of applying ethics to business when they stated that most people would agree that a set of moral principles or values should govern the actions of business, and most would agree that their decisions should be made in accordance with accepted principles of right and wrong. …","PeriodicalId":90357,"journal":{"name":"The journal of applied management and entrepreneurship","volume":"48 1","pages":"117-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of applied management and entrepreneurship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.3709.2016.OC.00007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

THE ABILITY TO TEACH INDIVIDUALS in organizational and workplace settings to make ethical decisions has become a significant problem for 21st-century companies (Ferrell, Fraedrich, and Ferrell, 2015). Enron, WorldCom, the housing crisis, and Bernie Madoffhave become unwelcome additions to our daily lexicon. Increasing public outrage has been aimed at both the business community and the business of higher education following the barrage of highly publicized scandals since 2000. A recent National Business Ethics Survey reported that 45% of employees have observed at least one unethical act of workplace misconduct in their organization. It may be argued that ethics has reached the status of an organizational crisis. For perhaps the first time ever, organizations realize that they must be responsible for the ethical instruction of their employees, and they can no longer simply rely on hiring bright and capable people and hoping that they would behave ethically when the situation calls for it (Ferrell et al., 2015). However, this realization creates a problem in many organizations.The problem is the inherent difficulty associated with teaching correct ethical and moral behavior inside workplace and organizational settings. This article includes a review of that specific business problem in light of two unique but connected ideas. The first unique idea is the concept of viewing ethical decisionmaking through a specific framework, the Ethic of Care (E°C). The second unique idea is the concept that leader emotional intelligence (EI) relates to the ability to introduce the E°C as a framework for fostering and encouraging ethical behavior in organizations. In connection with the business problem and the unique ideas, three specific propositions are presented in this paper. In addition to these three propositions, the article includes a discussion of ethics in business, applying ethics, ethics and EI, and the E°C and EI. First, a brief review of the relevant literature is presented.Literature reviewEthics in businessVelasquez (2006) notes that business ethics is applied ethics and that it is the application or understanding of what is good and right to that group of institutions, technologies, transactions, activities, and various pursuits that we refer to as a business. Any discussion of business ethics, therefore, begins by providing a framework of basic principles for understanding what is meant by the terms good and right and only then can one proceed to discuss the various implications these practices have for our business world (Velasquez, 2006). Schlegelmilch (2010) discusses the evolution of applied ethics to specific business disciplines. He also identifies 18 different areas where ethical issues can affect a business environment. Although not all of these areas will be considered here, it may be beneficial to list all 18 areas in order to provide a full framework for the discussion of ethics and business. These areas include: product-related issues, price-related issues, distribution, the promotion of products or services, sales and sales people, codes and ethical norms, consumers and consumer protections, issues specifically related to vulnerable consumer populations, international or crosscultural issues, consumer research and privacy, consumer education, issues related to environmentally sound or green initiatives, social marketing or social media, law or law enforcement, internet-related issues, religious issues, and the review of scholarly literature (Schlegelmilch, 2010). While writing a literature review for a specific business discipline, Schlegelmilch's work highlights the continuum of ethical issues in business over a period from the 1960s to 2000s. Other authors also addressed the issues of ethics in business.Ferrell and Gresham (1985) described the challenge of applying ethics to business when they stated that most people would agree that a set of moral principles or values should govern the actions of business, and most would agree that their decisions should be made in accordance with accepted principles of right and wrong. …
情商和关怀伦理
在组织和工作场所环境中教导个人做出道德决策的能力已经成为21世纪公司的一个重要问题(Ferrell, Fraedrich, and Ferrell, 2015)。安然(Enron)、世通(WorldCom)、房地产危机和伯尼•麦道夫(Bernie madoff)已经成为我们日常词汇中不受欢迎的新成员。自2000年以来,在一系列备受关注的丑闻之后,公众对商界和高等教育界的愤怒与日俱增。最近的一项全国商业道德调查显示,45%的员工在他们的组织中至少发现过一次不道德的工作场所不当行为。可以说,伦理已经达到了组织危机的程度。也许是有史以来第一次,组织意识到他们必须对员工的道德指导负责,他们不能再简单地依靠雇佣聪明而有能力的人,并希望他们在情况需要时表现得合乎道德(Ferrell et al., 2015)。然而,这种实现在许多组织中产生了一个问题。问题是在工作场所和组织环境中教授正确的伦理和道德行为的固有困难。本文将根据两个独特但相互关联的想法对该特定业务问题进行回顾。第一个独特的想法是通过一个特定的框架,即护理伦理(E°C)来看待道德决策的概念。第二个独特的观点是,领导者情商(EI)与将情商作为培养和鼓励组织中道德行为框架的能力有关。结合商业问题和独特的理念,本文提出了三个具体的主张。除了这三个命题,文章还包括对商业伦理,应用伦理,伦理和EI,以及E°C和EI的讨论。首先,简要回顾相关文献。velasquez(2006)指出,商业伦理是一种应用伦理,它是对我们称之为企业的一组制度、技术、交易、活动和各种追求的善和正确的应用或理解。因此,任何关于商业道德的讨论,首先都要提供一个基本原则框架,以理解“好”和“对”的含义,只有这样,人们才能继续讨论这些实践对我们商业世界的各种影响(Velasquez, 2006)。Schlegelmilch(2010)讨论了应用伦理学在特定商业学科中的演变。他还指出了道德问题可能影响商业环境的18个不同领域。虽然这里不会考虑所有这些领域,但列出所有18个领域可能是有益的,以便为讨论道德和商业提供一个完整的框架。这些领域包括:与产品相关的问题、与价格相关的问题、分销、产品或服务的推广、销售和销售人员、规范和道德规范、消费者和消费者保护、与弱势消费者群体具体相关的问题、国际或跨文化问题、消费者研究和隐私、消费者教育、与环保或绿色倡议相关的问题、社会营销或社交媒体、法律或执法、互联网相关问题;宗教问题,以及学术文献的回顾(Schlegelmilch, 2010)。Schlegelmilch在撰写一篇针对特定商业学科的文献综述时,强调了从20世纪60年代到21世纪初这段时间内商业道德问题的连续性。其他作者也谈到了商业道德问题。Ferrell和Gresham(1985)描述了将伦理应用于商业的挑战,他们说大多数人会同意一套道德原则或价值观应该管理商业行为,大多数人会同意他们的决定应该根据公认的对与错原则做出。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信