Evaluation of Pregnancy Outcomes in Relation to Placenta Previa Location

Ibrahim Sa, Farag Am, Badr Ms
{"title":"Evaluation of Pregnancy Outcomes in Relation to Placenta Previa Location","authors":"Ibrahim Sa, Farag Am, Badr Ms","doi":"10.4172/2161-0932.1000482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To evaluate the effect of the type and site of placenta previa on pregnancy outcomes. Methods: We studied retrospectively 324 women with singleton pregnancies presented with placenta previa. After diagnosis by trans abdominal U/S, the cases were grouped into complete and incomplete placenta previa, and then each were categorized to posterior and anterior groups. We compared maternal criteria and outcomes of neonates in complete and incomplete placentae previa, and the differences between the two groups were evaluated. Results: Women with complete placenta previa were more prevalent than those with incomplete placenta previa (59.2% versus 17.5%), with the higher incidence of preterm labor in women with complete than in those with incomplete placenta previa ( 45.2% versus 8.7%); Incidence of APH in complete placenta previa did not significantly differ between the posterior and the anterior groups. The anterior group was with higher incidence of preterm labor than the posterior group (76.3% versus 31.9%; p=0.002). Gestational age at labor with incomplete placenta previa didn't significantly differ between the posterior and anterior groups. Conclusion: Awareness should be taken towards the risk of increased maternal and fetal morbidity, especially with anterior placenta previa.","PeriodicalId":22164,"journal":{"name":"Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0932.1000482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the effect of the type and site of placenta previa on pregnancy outcomes. Methods: We studied retrospectively 324 women with singleton pregnancies presented with placenta previa. After diagnosis by trans abdominal U/S, the cases were grouped into complete and incomplete placenta previa, and then each were categorized to posterior and anterior groups. We compared maternal criteria and outcomes of neonates in complete and incomplete placentae previa, and the differences between the two groups were evaluated. Results: Women with complete placenta previa were more prevalent than those with incomplete placenta previa (59.2% versus 17.5%), with the higher incidence of preterm labor in women with complete than in those with incomplete placenta previa ( 45.2% versus 8.7%); Incidence of APH in complete placenta previa did not significantly differ between the posterior and the anterior groups. The anterior group was with higher incidence of preterm labor than the posterior group (76.3% versus 31.9%; p=0.002). Gestational age at labor with incomplete placenta previa didn't significantly differ between the posterior and anterior groups. Conclusion: Awareness should be taken towards the risk of increased maternal and fetal morbidity, especially with anterior placenta previa.
妊娠结局与前置胎盘位置的关系评价
目的:探讨前置胎盘类型和部位对妊娠结局的影响。方法:我们回顾性研究了324例单胎妊娠合并前置胎盘的妇女。经腹部超声诊断后,将病例分为完全前置胎盘和不完全前置胎盘,分别分为后前置胎盘组和前前置胎盘组。我们比较了完全前置胎盘和不完全前置胎盘新生儿的产妇标准和结局,并评估了两组之间的差异。结果:完全性前置胎盘的发生率高于不完全性前置胎盘(59.2%比17.5%),完全性前置胎盘的早产发生率高于不完全性前置胎盘(45.2%比8.7%);完全前置胎盘的APH发生率在前后两组间无显著差异。前路组早产发生率高于后路组(76.3%比31.9%;p = 0.002)。不完全前置胎盘分娩时胎龄前后组无显著差异。结论:应提高对母婴发病风险的认识,尤其是前前置胎盘。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信